• July 2, 2017

Best Monitor for Photo Editing and Video Editing (July 2017)

If you are a digital photographer, you will need a computer and a monitor to see your photos in order to evaluate or retouch them. And if you want a job well done, as often happens in photography, you can’t use just any monitor, you have to choose with care.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing

This may mean knowing how to decipher mysterious new acronyms and compare technical characteristics that seem to be made to be understood only by an engineer.

Of course you can find monitors that are extremely costly, designed for professionals with deeper pockets. But luckily there are affordable alternatives that are, in any case, a leap in quality when compared to the monitor based on a laptop or a desktop computer.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing recommendation:

Monitors that incorporate all the features that I listed about on prices between 100$ to 2000$.

With a little patience, however, you can find offers that will make saving a few dozen dollars. As I wrote before, if your budget is tight, of the features that I have described can find a compromise on size, but not on the other.

Disclaimer: Clicking on a “Details on Amazon” link will bring to you to the appropriate Amazon.com product listing, where you can check the price, customer reviews and more information about the product or similar products.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing Buying Guide

In this article I introduce the main features to consider in the selection of a monitor for photography and photo editing.

Purchasing a new monitor may be particularly useful if you use a portable computer, as many people do today. Reading the characteristics which follow, you’ll discover how laptops concentrate all the negative aspects.

In addition, a good monitor for photograph must have the option to be calibrated. Calibrating the monitor on a laptop is usually more difficult and sometimes we do not do so precisely.

What are the characteristics to assess in the choice of the monitor?

As is the case for any technology product, if you start delving deep into the technical specifications for computer monitors it seems like the lists are as numerous as confetti. Fortunately, however, the number of features to keep in mind for photographic use is limited.

Let’s look at them one by one.

Size

This is an easy-to-understand feature, certainly, the larger monitor is better. The difficult part is deciding which is the minimum size that allows us to work comfortably while not spending too much.

When choosing a monitor for your computing needs, you should first think about your desk size, vision acuity and the distance you’re sitting from the monitor. People who struggle with a tiny 13 inch notebook screen not only invite eyestrain but also poor posture. Displaying a highly detailed photograph or other image on a small screen like this does not help you see how it really is supposed to look.

Most laptops have 15 inch screens, but this is hardly better than the smaller option. What you gain in convenience and portability forces you to lose out on display quality and comfort. Photographers and artists need a larger and higher quality display in order to properly view and edit their pictures.

From what I’ve read, and according to my personal experience, I would recommend you do not drop below 24 inches, 27"-32" is a nice size for editing. If your budget is very tight you can settle for a 23-inch.

Monitors of this size are large enough to justify the expense. Furthermore, they allow you to view your pictures at a good level of magnification and simultaneously hold all the toolbars and panels typical of photo editing software and post-photographic production.

In particular, these dimensions relate to screens with proportions of 16:10. I believe the old 4:3 is no longer available, while the 16:9 favor the width too much when compared to the height and can make awkward access to functionality of the various programs.

The monitor’s 16:10 fits perfectly into pictures taken with the landscape orientation and also leave a generous amount of space for the various toolbars arranged vertically in many image editing programs.

Finally, this is the dimension that at the moment it offers the best price/performance ratio.

TN or IPS?

The Twisted Nematic (TN) is a very well known form of technology and it is also considered to be the oldest as well. Its best feature is that it gives short response times, which is why it is great for a gaming platform, but unfortunately is not good for a photographic use. When combined with LED lighting, a Twisted Nematic monitor can provide a lot of brightness and use less power than other technologies of its kind.

However, TN also has features that are not as advantageous. For instance, it has color distortions that happen when viewing wide angles. These monitors have 6 bit color technology. They are not able to show all the colors of the 24 bit color range that most video cards can show you, which add up to around 60 million colors. There are huge differences in certain products, but the ones that are on the low end will have a color for just the medium range angle changes. You will be able to recognize a Twisted Nematic monitor because of such color modifications, if you are looking at the picture from the top or from the sides.

In Plane Switching (IPS) is a contemporary technology that uses other types of technologies such as S-IPS, AS-IPS, H-IPS and E-IPS. The main reason that you want to use IPS panels is because they are either 8- or 10-bit technology. They produce a minimum of 125 percent of the colors that are available in the NTSC gamut. Also, these colors are not distorted when you look at them from various angles. The majority of them can be viewed well beyond 170 degrees. Previously, the only problem had to do with emphasizing the black colors, which usually meant that there were going to be some problems with the contrast. Also, IPS panels tend to be pricey and they are also slow at first.

Manufacturers have begun to produce Super IPS panels, but at cheaper prices. The response times have been reduced a lot and the contrast has been greatly enhanced. Also, the color display and the selections to calibrate the colors are a lot better than other panels of this kind. There is no distortion, even when you are viewing at shaper angles.

IPS monitors have not really been affordable, but the gap is starting to close. Just one year ago, most IPS monitors were three times expensive than the regular TN monitors. However, the 23 inch screens can be bought for around three hundred dollars these days. If you want professional graphic monitors that utilize IPS technology, you will have to still pay about a thousand dollars for it.

So the IPS monitor is the best monitor for photography mainly for two reasons:

  • Allows you to play a very large number of colors (close to 100% of the color space sRGB),
  • Provides a visual angle very high.

VA is another good technology

, but it is not used as much. Similar to IPS panels, this type of technology utilizes a minimum of 8 bit technology, provides good coverage and the colors are not distorted when shown at different angles.

Matte screen or Glossy Screen?

Glossy Screen

Matte screen

Indoors, the glossy can still reflect a great deal of light.

If you make a turn at any electronics store, you’ll notice how the monitors of portable and those for fixed computer screens have glossy screens.

The glossy appearance favors the contrast and vibrancy of colors and is designed for the use of the computer that is dedicated to the entertainment, but unfortunately, as far as sexy may seem, these monitors have several disadvantages that are particularly evident in photographic work.

For example, the glossy screens reflect the sources of light and even the shapes of what lies in front of the monitor, by altering the perception of what is shown, saturation and contrast do not correspond to the content of the photo, especially once it is printed.

The monitor is not glossy are said matte. They are easily recognizable in each case, you’ve worked a monitor of this type.

If you buy on the internet, you can’t recognize at a glance if a monitor is matte or glossy. You should be able to discover by looking between the technical characteristics or possibly looking for on Google the name of the monitor associated with the word glossy.

My advice:

If they will be shown on just one screen, both of them are no problems. If they will be utilized for print, then opt for matte, which will have better saturation as a result of the glossy screens. Glossy is not the same as what you will get with print.

Bit depth LUT

Monitor display calibration is limited no matter what model you own. Owners of digital monitors should resist any changes from the factory settings because this can result in a loss of colors and shades. One way to counteract this is by buying a monitor with a higher bit depth LUT. This not only affects the specificity of the calibration, but also allows the monitor to utilize more colors in its display.

Bit depth LUT

Note: Since the input values for the display remain the same, a higher bit depth LUT will not display more colors at the same time. A video card with a higher bit depth LUT will not improve accuracy of calibrations if not paired with a similarly equipped monitor.

In a system with a low bit depth, the darkest (1) and the brightest (4) shades merge with white (5) and black (0) because the shades themselves are rounded up or down to the closest output available. A system with a high bit depth LUT does not need to round shades to the closest output value that can use additional intermediate values. Because of this increased precision, posterization of image and color banding are not a problem for even the oldest and most color-changed displays.

Most currently available monitors have 8-bit LUT, though 6-bit and higher 10-bit LUT’s are also on the market. For most purposes, 8-bit options deliver quality calibrations and clearer, color-true pictures. There are also monitors, usually LCD and marketed specifically to gamers, that sacrifice bit depth LUT for higher refresh rates. This process is the quick change of animated graphics in that many games with more quality and smoothness, but is no importance for those interested in viewing photos and still graphics.

Standard Gamut or Wide Gamut (Extended Gamut)?

RGBAll physical devices have restrictions when it comes to the types of colors that it can provide. An inkjet printer does not have the ability to produce a better shade of yellow than what is provided by the ink cartridge. The shade of red that your monitor shows is restricted by the hardware that is utilized in the LCD panel. This is known as the device’s color gamut.

A majority of monitors have a color gamut that matches the SRGB color gamut. You might already know that the sRGB color gamut does not have as much as the more commonly utilized Adobe 1998 version. Also, a lot of the Adobe colors that can be printed via your inkjet printer are actually not in the range of the SRGB colors. As a result, your camera can provide these colors and they can be printed with your printer. However, you cannot see them on your monitor. Basically, you will view an estimate of these colors because they are restricted by the monitor’s color gamut.

Wide gamut monitors get rid of this issue because what they have is matched up with a bigger amount of what the Adobe 1998 has. You can find this amount in the monitor’s specs. The benefit of this is that you can view colors in your pictures that look brighter than the regular gamut monitor. This gives you the ability to see all of the colors in your pictures.

It is best to have a wide gamut display because this is the way of the future. This is practically what is available right now. To utilize this type of display, you have to know about color managed workflows and possess a display that has the right calibration. You also have to utilize a color managed app such as Photoshop. This is not that hard to manage, but you have to know exactly what you are doing in order to be successful with it.

How to choose:

Depending on your photo and graphic display and editing needs, you need to choose a monitor that covers the sRGB spectrum and possibly the Adobe RPG spectrum as well. The first specification is found on every single quality monitor on the market today.

The sRGB spectrum is more than sufficient for web-based photographs and all graphics that are intended to be displayed on a monitor in their final form. For artists that print their work, the Adobe RPG spectrum capable monitor will result in better clarity, color correctness and ultimately higher-quality work.

Currently, nearly all monitor can cover more than 99% of the sRGB spectrum however not all of them can cover most of the Adobe RGB spectrum.

LED Monitors

You are entering the market monitor LCD backlit LED. in this case too there are different types, corresponding to different acronyms.

For photographic use, ask attention to buy a monitor RGB LED and not el-wled . The second option does not provide a color reproduction sufficiently faithful.

Viewing Angle

The first LCD monitor for your computer suffered from an angle of view very reduced. What does that mean?

With a reduced visual angle, moving left to right, top or bottom with respect to the central axis of the monitor, the colors are transformed and the contrast changes . You can imagine how it is absolutely recommended in a monitor to use for photo retouching.

The monitor of more recent production, allow you to move to the right or to the left relative to the monitor without noting obvious changes in the image. Choose a monitor with at least 120° of visual angle horizontal and possibly the same for the vertical.

Resolution

On this aspect there is little to say, the available resolutions are not a lot, especially, the resolution is also determined by the size of the diagonal.

For a monitor by 23 or 24 inches, the size that I advised before, do not fall under a native resolution of 1920 * 1200. Recalls that LCD monitors should be always used to their resolution, so don’t think you can use a resolution higher or lower than the one specified.

Should You Buy a 4K monitor?

Any full-size image on a 4K monitor will be displayed with enough detail and beauty for a photographer’s appreciation. Your palettes tools can also be set to an incredible number.

These pictures also require the ability to zoom in and out in a photo editing program like Photoshop and also to display text and fonts clearly and at the correct size. This differs from standard video, television or gaming monitor usage.

Most computer software applications are designed to make use of full high definition resolutions, which results in text that is easily viewed from a standard distance away. In 4K format, text minimizes to an uncomfortable level in the same programs and software apps.

4K is becoming highly active in the 2016 market but this display technology is outpacing some of the older programs that people still use every day. If you combine software usage from even two or three years ago with the new 4K option, the size of your text will be unreadable. This makes for very difficult computing and a lot of frustration between modern technology usage and keeping older but not yet obsolete software.

In order to get the best benefit from 4K, you need to make sure that the programs you use work well with it. Many of the standard Windows applications work well with 4K already although some Windows desktop ecosystems may lag behind this technology.

By far the most popular graphics and photography editing software, Adobe Photoshop, is already working well with 4K displays. Even the largest pictures can be viewed with full detail at high resolutions and in actual size without the need to zoom in or out or scroll the workspace. The entire Photoshop interface scales easily so you have no problem accessing all your favorite tools and palettes. If you are regularly engaged in photography or graphics editing or work with videos, a 4K monitor is virtually essential.

To conclude, my personal opinion is that the 4K display capabilities are very attractive but not quite yet practical for all uses. In your excitements about this new technology, it is still important to hang back a bit and make sure all your existing hardware and the programs you use regularly work with the 4K monitor before you purchase one.

Digital connection

Now all of the monitors should be equipped with a digital connection, HDMI or DVI. Be careful not to buy a fund of magazine that has only the VGA.

Also, check which ports are available on your computer. Don’t worry, however: adapters exist able to convert any format.

Our recommendation:

Eizo ColorEdge CG277 (High end choice, 10-bit color +16 bit LUT, 99% Adobe RGB)

Eizo ColorEdge CG277

EIZO’s crown jewel, the ColorEdge CG277 monitor, is aimed at professionals in the video editing, digital photography, prepress, and post production fields. And honestly, it’s the perfect screen for them, with its 27-inch wide CG277 display any professional would appreciate, housing a self-calibrating sensor that shifts up to store neatly into its frame. The CG277’s internal correction sensor utilizes an external sensor to store and maintain calibration results. It can pack a punch with all of its bells and whistles: a 2560×1440 pixel resolution, a 10-bit display complete with 16-bit look-up table, a wide-gamut IPS panel capable of reproducing 99% of the Adobe RGB colour space, DVI-D input terminals, LED backlight, a DisplayPort, and HDMI capacity. But, if you can believe it, that’s not all it comes with! The Eizo ColorEdge CG277 also has tone characteristics that activate a mere seven minutes post-powerup, stable brightness chromaticity, an elegant ergonomic stand, and, to top it all off, a monitor hood capable of switching between portrait mode and landscape.

It is singularly considered to be the best choice for imaging professionals that work with video or still production. Why?

Well, this is mainly due to the CG277’s phenomenal colour accuracy. Despite having just raved about how amazing it is, we do need to stress that its lack of 4K resolution does somewhat decrease how appealing it is as a screen, in comparison to other 4K models out on the market. And yet, it is this small flaw, interestingly enough, other 4K models helps keep the cost of this outstanding monitor low. What does this all mean for professional users? Plainly put, it means that it’s an excellent time to purchase it at such an affordable price.

Ideally, all that CG277 performance and power would come in a much more eye-catching frame. But, that bulky screen is really no big deal when you add up all the pros about this model. Honestly, this 27incher has the same footprint as its same-sized competitors, all thanks to its unobtrusive, yet highly efficient, monitor stand.

The Eizo CG277’s built-in calibration sensor may be considered a tad on the useless side for professionals or companies that prefer a uniform sensor for their displays. But, undoubtedly, there are countless businesses or individual professionals out there that have only one quality screen to rely on, and in turn, will invariably believe this built-in sensor is very convenient.

If you’re in need of a solid, dependable display for your professional grade work, then there are no hard cons, only pros, with the CG277. Enthusiasts will note that there are other screens out there that would provide an equally excellent performance for a fraction of the price.

Our Opinion

You’ll be hard-pressed to find a better display for colour accuracy than the Eizo ColorEdge CG277, although others may not have that 4K resolution if that’s what you’re looking for. However, if you’re a professional that doesn’t depend primarily on display resolution, the CG277 is an attractive option.

>>Read More information and user reviews on B&H Photo<<

ASUS PA329Q – High end choice, 4K, 10 bit, 99.5% Adobe RGB, 32 inch

ASUS PA329Q

Check out the ASUS PA329Q ultra-wide monitor if you’re shopping for a top quality professional grade screen since the high pixel density is an absolute ‘must have’ feature. That’s why we’re looking at Asus’ sleek PA329Q model right now with its ever popular 32-inch Ultra HD resolution IPS panel.

Professionals need a truly reliable monitor that can withstand whatever tough project their job requires them to do. So, with that in mind, it’s clear to see that the Asus’ ProArt series provides users exactly what they need with its wide range of factory-calibrated color choices. We had previously assessed the PA328Q model which boasted everything a professional would require for their color-critical applications, with the exception of a wide-gamut option. However, here we look into the PA329Q features 32-inch IPS panel and Ultra HD resolution capabilities, including the ever-so-useful addition of Adobe RGB.

Above all else, the PA329Q is, without a doubt, an excellent price. In comparison to other similar 32-inch Ultra HD monitors, the Asus PA329Q, with its sleek style and consistent screen output, simply gives you much more value-wise. And, even though it is one of the few monitors classified in its range, it stands out for its resolution and wide-gamut option.

In all honestly, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a poor quality product amongst truly professional monitors. Although not all screens are created equally, once you do start to assess factory-certified calibration PC monitors you’re, essentially, guaranteed a certain level of quality. And, without exception, the PA329Q upholds that standard of accuracy. The Asus PA329Q is, therefore, a smart choice for users seeking professional-grade level models.

We like the PA329Q and its many capabilities and would certainly recommend it to those on the lookout for a less expensive alternative to higher-end (and higher price range) screens. Although we’d appreciate seeing more extensive color meter support and more of the OSD’s features available with extra picture modes, we do appreciate its fixed RGB and Adobe RGB mode reliability. Asus adds on even more value by including user-friendly calibration software. Aside from those points, this model would make a sturdy, dependable addition to any professional’s office.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

LG 31MU97 Great Choice for Video Editing 4096×2160, (True 4K), 99.5% Adobe RGB, 31 inch

LG 31MU97

Prepare to be amazed at the LG 31MU97-B’s resolution, which is an impressive 4096 x 2160p, and is specifically targeted towards a more professional crowd. This LG native 4K resolution display will most certainly delight photographers, graphic designers, and video editors alike with its professional-grade capabilities. We believe video editors will be particularly pleased because of the LG 31MU97-B monitor’s relative ease of use, and remarkably hassle-free, video post-production abilities with minimal to nil levels of distortion.

Users can smoothly multitask between different programs, all without having to switch back and forth between windows, on this 17:9 aspect ratio widescreen, which can prove to be a real timesaver. Consequently, users can take advantage of this feature to compare and contrast graphics and pictures and observe any colour variances without the hassle of going back-and-forth between windows.

LG 31MU97-B’s IPS display supports 99.5% Adobe RGB. Its wide colour gamut (and colour temperature) reduces any colour difference and loss which, incidentally, covers both color ranges or CMYK and sRGB. This means users can effortlessly retouch their images and photos. The end result is unbelievably vivid and vibrant colours on your final product which other panels (like the VA) simply cannot provide.

After having mentioned all this, do keep in mind that, when you push this monitor to its optimum resolution of 4096×2160p at 50 Hz, it does become a bit shaky. Unfortunately, the LG 31MU97-B screen does not support a 60Hz Refresh Rate. So, that means any animated transitions, sliding through windows, or even so much as scrolling up and down webpages can seem to be a bit jerky. Although it’s a noticeable issue, we can’t say it’s overtly distracting, particularly if you’re used to screens that run at 60Hz. Luckily, you can avoid all this by turning it down to 3840×2160 which allows you to run at 60Hz. Users will still need to deal with a bit of letterboxing once they select this option, but it’s a small price to pay to avoid frame rate reduction.

For those professionals in need of a high-tech, top-level PC monitor, loaded with the latest technology to date, then the multi-functional and fully loaded LG 31MU97-B is the answer. Ideal for videographers, photographers, graphic designers, or basically anyone who deals with content creation requiring consistent, accurate, and clear colour. Having said this, a monitor of this caliber is, in fact, best suited for people that need 10-bit colour/Adobe RGB colour gamut or Cinema 4K resolution.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

BenQ SW2700PT – Mid-end Choice, 99% ADOBE RGB, 2560×1440, 14 bit

BenQ SW2700PT

Are you a professional on the hunt for a top quality monitor known for its unique colour capacity and intense display palette? You’ll need to look no further than the BenQ 27-inch SW2700PT. Professionals prefer this model because of its detailed QHD screen resolution which is considered to be the best in its class.

With its 100% AdobeRGB capabilities, the technologically advanced BenQ SW2700PT screen stands out clearly from other monitors. Its sharp images and crisp definition demonstrate a superior colour saturation with an excellent vivid contrast. Despite its accuracy to display images, the BenQ SW2700PT’s screen consistency cannot quite compete with more expensive, higher grade models. However, considering the surprisingly affordable $600 price tag on this monitor, it is undoubtedly a fantastic value considering its technological capabilities. In fact, you’d need to spend upwards of $1200 for better screen consistency, which makes the BenQ SW2700PT a real steal at that price.

With a clear 2,560-by-1,440-resolution screen, the SW2700PT monitor boasts an impressive 27-inch WQHD matte panel which is all based on advanced AHVA technology. It’s easy to see how similar to In-Plane Switching (IPS) technology it is, considering its wide viewing angles and stunning color intensity. This monitor allows for hardware calibration allowing the user to access screen processing circuitry to adjust color settings for preference, instead of altering GPU output. Additionally, the SW2700PT monitor uses a 14-bit Look-Up Table (LUT) which controls color management and ensures precise, smooth color gradation. Users will need to acquire their own colorimeter, but, by downloading BenQ’s free proprietary Palette Master Element calibration software, they can save any selected settings as a preset and easily calibrate their monitor.

This screen is remarkably well designed with excellent additional features such as a built-in USB3 hub with SD card reader and the handy remote control that allows for quick, seamless setting changes. The SW2700PT monitor and shading hood is ergonomically designed and includes such useful features as the multi-adjustable screen stand that is capable of pivoting positions from landscape to portrait. Colour-wise, although its colour performance is rated as solid and reliable, the SW2700PT’s black and white display values and accuracies are considered to be superb. This monitor will most assuredly please professional photographers, graphic artists, and designers since it covers 100% of Adobe RGB. Personally, I would prefer a newer HDMI 2.0 port as opposed to the outdated HDMI 1.4 port this screen offers, but that’s a pretty trivial issue considering it by no means prevents us from giving our Editors’ Choice award to the BenQ SW2700PT for the midrange, big-screen monitor category.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Dell P2715Q and P2415Q – 4K monitor, 79% AdobeRGB, 27 or 23.8 inch

Dell P2715Q

Are you looking for a monitor that can deliver a particularly excellent image quality? Then the factory-calibrated P2715Q will ensure pristine color quality reproduction from day one and guarantee any user with near-real-life imagery. Initial screen tests showed that it could, in fact, cover 79% of the AdobeRGB spectrum and 100% of the sRGB spectrum. We were impressed! Moreover, the contrast ratio is remarkable reaching 690:1 when at maximum brightness.

According to industry photographers, the DELL P2715Q surpasses expectations with its superb colour and picture quality, as well as colour production, thanks to its 4K resolution and IPS panel. Keep in mind that only a select few other monitors nowadays offer wider colour gamuts. Also, most inexpensive 4K screens can only manage about 70 to 75% of the AdobeRGB spectrum. All this means that the P2715Q is, without a doubt, ahead of its time. Nevertheless, you definitely want to purchase a display that is closer to 100% Adobe RGB if you’ll need to do any Illustrator, Lightroom, or Photoshop work, thus requiring higher quality, or magazine-ready, printing. Moreover, the contrast ratio on this UHD PC monitor is considered to be truly one of the best on the market to date.

Unquestioningly, the Dell P2715Q is an advanced 4K monitor in comparison to other similar range models out there. It was one of the first monitors to offer exceptional image quality at an affordable price, all while supplying the user with a durable frame, an ergonomic stand, and fully functional 3840 x 2160 pixels of full UHD visual connectivity. If you don’t have a lot of space in your office set-up, or if you perhaps wish to save a bit money-wise, then the Dell P2415Q would be a great selection for you due to its smaller size. Truth be told, this monitor’s factory-calibrated picture is minimally less accurate than our preferred screen choice, but in the end, the difference is trivial. When it comes down to it, this 24-inch screen has many similarities as the larger P2715Q: the same display connections and IPS panel type, the same display resolution (3840×2160), audio connection and USB 3.0 hub (minus one port), and the same VESA support and physical adjustability.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Philips 276E6ADSS – Affordable wide gamut Monitor, Price under 300$

Philips 276E6ADSS

First off, we’d like to emphasize how truly interesting and unique the Philips 276E6 because of its wide colour gamut which is void of unnecessarily costly or complex backlight arrangement. The key is the screen’s IPS-ADS and Quantum Dots combo. With it, the monitor is capable of producing an exceptionally fine, bright image with outstanding color saturation, some great viewing angles, pretty decent contrast, and lots of light output. Want to know a little perk? It does all of this with ultra-low power consumption. A fantastic quality considering its lower price category within the range of rank-and-file professional screens.

However, there are a few drawbacks when compared to elite range screens, like the Dell UP2716D, that have wide gamut capabilities. Prominent issues include the lack of emulation modes in order to cut down on native colour gamut as well as the use of PWM for regulating backlight. Keeping these shortcomings in mind, we would not recommend the Philips 276E6ADSS for any color-critical work. Yet, it will surely satisfy all other users with its lovely image quality.

There are a few more points not in its favor that we feel we should mention, namely, its lower resolution, surprising lack of ports, the absence of overall ergonomic flexibility, and VESA mounting. Also, this screen only comes in white. Now, that’s not necessarily a drawback, but, some users will go for it, while others will simply be put-off. It’s not a perfect monitor by any means, but it’s a nice option for users that have a limited budget to work with and will appreciate a monitor that offers an Adobe RGB colour gamut.

Many professionals like the option to have color saturation beyond what typical video standards require. Standard HDTV picture modes, for instance, will have options like Vivid and Brilliant which increase gamut to enhance screen image. It’s not just for showroom purposes; plenty of people gladly use them daily. The Philips 276E6 is perfect for users who prefer this approach as it offers a wide gamut with loads of brightness and high clarity at an affordable price. The Philips white frame and elegant modern styling will certainly stand out amidst a sea of industrial black monitors.

That $300 price tag is sure hard to beat, but of course, it all depends on your preferences and priorities. If wide gamut, sharp colors and quantum dots are an absolute requirement for you, then the Philips 276E6, costing less than $300, is one of the few ways you can bring those things home.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

last comments ...
Dan
Dan

Hi, I'm new in photo editing. I'm looking to upgrade my monitor and came across a ViewSonic model VP2468, has…
nilesh
nilesh

thanks very useful details
JD
JD

Hi Dan, I too have been looking at the Viewsonic VP2468. I have 4 Viewsonics and they have all…
Andre B
Andre B

Very informative article, thank you. I found this BenQ BL2420U UHD Designer monitor. Has anyone used it and if…
Jeff
Jeff

I was looking at getting the LG 31MU97, but now the new LG 32UD99 that was at CES this year…

  • July 18, 2017

Nikon D7500 Review: the difference between Nikon D7500 vs. D5600 vs. D500

It has only just been released and it has already been tested! I have just spend over a week testing the new professional reflex camera from the Nikon DX product line: the Nikon D7500.

More than 2000 photos later, here is all the information you will need to determine whether or not this reflex camera – which is situated between the D5600 and the D500 – is right for you!

Test of the Nikon D7500: presentation

The Nikon D7500 is an APS-C reflex camera with an impressive technical datasheet which completes the Nikon DX product lineup:

  • 20 megapixel sensor without a low-pass filter from the Nikon D500,
  • Expeed 5 processor,
  • 8 images/second burst mode,
  • integrated flash,
  • 4K video in mp4 format.

You can consult the list of differences between the D500 and the D7500 here.

The Nikon D7500 is the answer for photographers who are in search of a DX camera with professional ergonomics and with the best currently available Nikon DX sensor within a compact and light-weight format. In other words, performance characteristics very similar to those of the D500 – if you don’t mind living without certain technical and ergonomic features – all for a lower price of around 700 euros (according to a comparison of publicly available prices).

Nikon D7500

As I do for every camera, I conducted this test of the Nikon D7500 under different shooting conditions in order to evaluate its general performance. In the text that follows, I will give you my opinion of this camera after having used it, in comparison to other models which I have recently tested – the D500 in particular.

Test of the Nikon D7500: ranking

With the introduction of the Nikon D7500, Nikon was able to reorganize its professional DX product line. Instead of offering only one professional model, as was previously the case with the D7000, D7100 and D7200, it is now possible to choose between two models:

  • the Nikon D500,
  • and the Nikon D7500.

Nikon D7500 vs Nikon D500

Both of these models use the same sensor, meaning that the image quality of both is the same. It is in terms of performance and ergonomics that these two cameras differ:

(more…)

  • July 11, 2017

Different types of camera lenses and their uses: The indispensable lenses you should buying

This is our third buyer’s guide dedicated to lenses. If you were forced to choose between a good camera and a good lens what would be your choice? Many of us would normally choose the camera since it is full of gadgets and innovations. But, would that really be the best choice?

The lens: your camera’s most crucial component

The lens is one of your camera’s most crucial components, if not THE most crucial (for both reflex and hybrid cameras): the lens is what makes it possible to capture light. Put a poor-quality lens on a good-quality camera and you will quickly discover that the camera will not be able to achieve its full potential. The opposite is also true to a lesser extent, and there is really no point in putting a very high-end lens on an entry-level camera.

Lens

The idea here is to find the right balance, without forgetting that a lens is an investment that will undoubtedly outlive your current camera – if you intend to remain with the same manufacturer when you buy your next camera. It is probable that you will change cameras in 3, 6 or 8 years, but the same can not be said about your lenses, especially if you have chosen good-quality ones. Lenses do not really wear out, they do not really get damaged (depending on how you use them) and do not really diminish in quality relative to the new lenses appearing on the market.

(more…)

  • July 10, 2017

Nikon D750 vs D810 vs D610 vs D4s vs DF, What’s the difference?

Full Frame: Nikon’s bold gamble

When Nikon announced D750, two things happened. First, some slowdown was noticed amongst buyers of D810, of which a quite significant number would have waited a little more to invest in a D750 and by the way saved 1000 dollars in price difference. I can understand them, it makes sense even if, a closer examination shows that Nikon D810 has some specificities that D750 does not have; we will get back to this. Then, and strangely enough, some have thought that the launch of D750 marked the end of Nikon D610. And that frankly, I do not buy for a second, I rather believe the opposite. I think that with the launch of D750, Nikon has firmly established its range of digital SLR (Single Lens Reflex), taking up the challenge of full frame. Personally, this range does holds up, up to four times better. Except for Nikon D750, I have used all cases of the Nikon full frame range during long work sessions. Just yesterday, I was working on pictures taken with Nikon D610 and I was captivated by the image quality, dynamism and sharpness. Last July, during an interview, I was asked what would be my advice to a young professional photographer wishing to start using the Nikon range and I answered without a moment’s pause, Nikon D610. My answer might be different today with the announcement of Nikon D750, but nonetheless, each Nikon case belonging to the full frame frame range has its own assets. It is impossible to contrast one with another and difficult to compare them. Each reflex has its target and its customers it will match. Following is a brief overview of the Nikon 24*26 range, but first a basic question. Why choose a Full Frame?

http://img.thedigitalcamera.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/nikon-dslr.jpg

Why a full frame format DSLR?

Photographers from Argentina (mentioning no names) would look at you in a funny manner if you were to ask them that question. This is because, in olden days, you see, the film was not cut into pieces, a SLR (single lens reflex) camera was 24*36 and that was it. When the digital showed up, there were contingencies and technical requirements which made it more economical and less costly to manufacture sensors that are not full format. In the beginning, Nikon has delivered DX sensors with a conversion factor of 1.5. Canon, on its side, has made APS-C sensors on its amateurs range (conversion factor of 1.6) and even APS-H (conversion factor of 1.3) on some SLR of the Pro range (e.g. EOS 1D Mark IV). Some have seen in the non full frame sensor a major advantage. Indeed, an optical of 200mm behaved like a focal of 320mm, all this with the help of APS-C sensor alone. But what was interesting upstream proved more difficult in the other direction. It was not wise enough for a 16mm to become a 26mm. Full format also affects other parameters such as the depth of field, the quality of the image and its dynamics and leads to a more demanding range of optics.

(more…)

last comments
Jozef
Jozef

As a Nikon D3s shooter I was about to choose D810 for a second camera for weddings. Well since the…
Spanky
Spanky

I think we need to seperate our love and passion for these truly more capable devices, from our all to…

  • July 8, 2017

Nikon D7500 vs. Nikon D500: what’s the difference?

With the announcement of the D7500 and Nikon’s intentions of retaining the D7200 in their product catalog, choosing a professional APS-C DX reflex camera has become more difficult. So, Nikon D7500 or Nikon D500, which one should you choose? Listed here are the main differences between these two devices as well as a comparison chart to help you make up your mind.

Nikon D7500 or Nikon D500: Which Nikon DX should you choose?

By announcing the Nikon D7500, Nikon was satisfying the demands of users interested in a professional device with an ergonomic design (see the test of the Nikon D500) as well as those users interested in a lighter, more compact device that is as capable as any other.

(more…)

  • July 6, 2017

Best Full Frame DSLR Camera 2017 Buying Guide (Cheapest and professional Canon, Nikon, Sony DSLR)

After having discussed the best models of APS-C DSLR cameras, here is our buyer’s guide for digital full frame models.

Full frame cameras have a 24×36 mm format sensor which provides superior image quality; they are also built to provide good long-term performance. This past year, no revolutionary technology has been released as far as full frame cameras are concerned, except for the fact that sensors without low-pass filters have become a standard feature. There is however a race going on, a race for increased performance and Nikon is currently offering no fewer than five full frame DSLR cameras! Competition is fierce and it is leading to the development of ever more powerful cameras.

Why buy a full frame DSLR camera?

Before presenting the different available models, let’s take another look at the characteristics that make full frame DSLR cameras so interesting.

(more…)

  • July 6, 2017

Sony A7 vs A7ii, what’s the difference?

Late last month, Sony silently launched the latest full-frame mirrorless camera A7II. I can’t help but admire how well Sony kept this innovation confidential before its release. Sony is perhaps one of the few companies that could afford to launch a new model of a full-frame camera at a yearly rate. Actually, it’s no wonder that the A7 series has been selling so well. Their integral market performance since their release is surpassing Sony’s expectations. The latest A7II may have caused some confusion for those planning on purchasing one– Sony α7II and Sony α7, which model is better?

Before that, we all regarded the three models of A7, A7R, and A7S with different positioning as the three brothers of the full-frame SLR cameras in the Sony A7 series. However, the latest A7II is the brother with the closest kinship to A7. Even so, between these two brothers, which one should we choose? This is a question we need to ponder. Since the A7II was just launched, currently its single body price is $1698. The A7 has been marketed for more than a year and features a higher performance price ratio, but its current price on Amazon is only $1298. With that price difference of $400, we can almost buy another Sony A6000. So what justifies this gap of $400?

(more…)

last comments
ryan
ryan

Hi .Does canon zoom lens autofocus on son a7 mark 2? thanks
Kevin Lin
Kevin Lin

Hi, You will need a Metabones adapter for it to auto focus
james
james

Quick question, I shoot mainly street at the moment but do enjoy Macro, I have a minolta Beercan…

  • July 3, 2017

Best APS-C Camera 2017 Buying Guide(Entry-level, Mid-level and professional)

Are you in the market for a DSLR camera? This buyer’s guide is dedicated to the best entry-level, mid-level and professional APS-C DSLR cameras available at the moment.

Centerpiece of photography, the DSLR camera is the go-to camera for demanding photographers. These last few years, and despite the competition from hybrid cameras, digital DSLR cameras have continued to evolve by focusing on image quality and versatility, thanks to an ever increasing selection of available lenses.

Why buy a DSLR camera?

DSLR cameras are still the most well regarded cameras by any serious photographer because of the considerable advantages that they offer over other types of devices. Their continuous development over the last few years has transformed DSLR cameras into tried and true devices with better autonomy and longevity (this last factor varies depending on the product level).

(more…)

  • July 2, 2017

Best Monitor for macbook Pro and Mac Mini/Air 2017

Because of the Apple PC’s excellent screen, the presentation of color gradation, hue, and contrast is much better than that of traditional PC computers. Thus it is the main choice for many professional video and photograph editors. In particular, the recent launch of the Apple MacBook Pro and MacBook Mini with retina screens further established that Apple has the professional user in mind. The only drawback is that MacBook Pro’s 13 or 15.4-inch screen is too small. In fact the MacBook Air only has an 11.6-inch screen. If you usually use your Mac only to browse the web, screen size it is not so important. But for those who run complex software (such as Xcode or Photoshop), the MacBook’s screen cannot cope with all the windows. Users will need to keep pressing Option-Tab to switch between windows. An external monitor does allow you to have more display space, and helps you get the job done more efficiently.

macbook Pro

It is worth mentioning that not only does an external monitor offer a larger display space, but there is also some software optimized for multi-display software (such as Aperture and iMovie) that offers more convenience. For example, if you use iMovie to edit video on a single display, the movie preview windows will be pushed to the upper-right corner of the screen by other windows. If you have two monitors, you can use one screen exclusively for the movie preview and put the other windows on the second monitor.

(more…)

last comments ...
Nancy Nafziger
Nancy Nafziger

Thanks for the info. It's the best info I could find on the web! I have a…
Jill
Jill

What is the best 27 " monitor for photo editing I have a Mac Book Pro 10.6
Denise
Denise

Hi I have a macbook pro 13 inch with retina but want a larger screen for desk about 23 no…
Cheryl Martens
Cheryl Martens

Thank-you for the review. I have a few questions concerning monitor quality. I have a macbook pro 13" and I…
Haaspeni
Haaspeni

Thank you for very good review. I have two question. Is BenQ SW 2700PT a good choise for both Mac…

  • July 1, 2017

Canon EOS Reble T7i vs 77D vs T6i vs T6s, what’s the difference?

The latest product in the long chain of entry level Canon DSLRs are the Canon EOS Rebel T7i and EOS 77d. The origin of the Canon DSLRs can be traced back to the original EOS Digital Rebel that was introduced sometime in 2003.

From then till date, all the updates and iterations following it have all been generally accepted as a market choice by both experienced and new users. The latest EOS Rebel T6i/T6s from Canon has proven to be a market best choice entry-level DSLRs. It comes with features that make it suitable for new users, while its polished handling makes its usability easy.

The T7i and the 77D can be considered as two different models of the same product. While the T7i follows the model style of the classic Canon XX0D series in manipulation, the 77D takes 80D as an example, as it is not only equipped with a top LCD display but also has an installed Quick Canon Control dial, forming the classic double-command dial control style of Canon.

(more…)