Best Monitor for Photo Editing and Photography (December 2016)

If you are a digital photographer, you will need a computer and a monitor to see your photos in order to evaluate or retouch them. And if you want a job well done, as often happens in photography, you can’t use just any monitor, you have to choose with care.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing

This may mean knowing how to decipher mysterious new acronyms and compare technical characteristics that seem to be made to be understood only by an engineer.

Of course you can find monitors that are extremely costly, designed for professionals with deeper pockets. But luckily there are affordable alternatives that are, in any case, a leap in quality when compared to the monitor based on a laptop or a desktop computer.

In this article I introduce the main features to consider in the selection of a monitor for photography and photo editing.

Vade retro portable

Purchasing a new monitor may be particularly useful if you use a portable computer, as many people do today. Reading the characteristics which follow, you’ll discover how laptops concentrate all the negative aspects.

In addition, a good monitor for photograph must have the option to be calibrated. Calibrating the monitor on a laptop is usually more difficult and sometimes we do not do so precisely.

What are the characteristics to assess in the choice of the monitor?

As is the case for any technology product, if you start delving deep into the technical specifications for computer monitors it seems like the lists are as numerous as confetti. Fortunately, however, the number of features to keep in mind for photographic use is limited.

Let’s look at them one by one.

Size

This is an easy-to-understand feature, certainly, the larger monitor is better. The difficult part is deciding which is the minimum size that allows us to work comfortably while not spending too much.

When choosing a monitor for your computing needs, you should first think about your desk size, vision acuity and the distance you’re sitting from the monitor. People who struggle with a tiny 13 inch notebook screen not only invite eyestrain but also poor posture. Displaying a highly detailed photograph or other image on a small screen like this does not help you see how it really is supposed to look.

Most laptops have 15 inch screens, but this is hardly better than the smaller option. What you gain in convenience and portability forces you to lose out on display quality and comfort. Photographers and artists need a larger and higher quality display in order to properly view and edit their pictures.

From what I’ve read, and according to my personal experience, I would recommend you do not drop below 24 inches, 27″-32″ is a nice size for editing. If your budget is very tight you can settle for a 23-inch.

Monitors of this size are large enough to justify the expense. Furthermore, they allow you to view your pictures at a good level of magnification and simultaneously hold all the toolbars and panels typical of photo editing software and post-photographic production.

In particular, these dimensions relate to screens with proportions of 16:10. I believe the old 4:3 is no longer available, while the 16:9 favor the width too much when compared to the height and can make awkward access to functionality of the various programs.

The monitor’s 16:10 fits perfectly into pictures taken with the landscape orientation and also leave a generous amount of space for the various toolbars arranged vertically in many image editing programs.

Finally, this is the dimension that at the moment it offers the best price/performance ratio.

TN or IPS?

The Twisted Nematic (TN) is a very well known form of technology and it is also considered to be the oldest as well. Its best feature is that it gives short response times, which is why it is great for a gaming platform, but unfortunately is not good for a photographic use. When combined with LED lighting, a Twisted Nematic monitor can provide a lot of brightness and use less power than other technologies of its kind.

However, TN also has features that are not as advantageous. For instance, it has color distortions that happen when viewing wide angles. These monitors have 6 bit color technology. They are not able to show all the colors of the 24 bit color range that most video cards can show you, which add up to around 60 million colors. There are huge differences in certain products, but the ones that are on the low end will have a color for just the medium range angle changes. You will be able to recognize a Twisted Nematic monitor because of such color modifications, if you are looking at the picture from the top or from the sides.

In Plane Switching (IPS) is a contemporary technology that uses other types of technologies such as S-IPS, AS-IPS, H-IPS and E-IPS. The main reason that you want to use IPS panels is because they are either 8- or 10-bit technology. They produce a minimum of 125 percent of the colors that are available in the NTSC gamut. Also, these colors are not distorted when you look at them from various angles. The majority of them can be viewed well beyond 170 degrees. Previously, the only problem had to do with emphasizing the black colors, which usually meant that there were going to be some problems with the contrast. Also, IPS panels tend to be pricey and they are also slow at first.

Manufacturers have begun to produce Super IPS panels, but at cheaper prices. The response times have been reduced a lot and the contrast has been greatly enhanced. Also, the color display and the selections to calibrate the colors are a lot better than other panels of this kind. There is no distortion, even when you are viewing at shaper angles.

IPS monitors have not really been affordable, but the gap is starting to close. Just one year ago, most IPS monitors were three times expensive than the regular TN monitors. However, the 23 inch screens can be bought for around three hundred dollars these days. If you want professional graphic monitors that utilize IPS technology, you will have to still pay about a thousand dollars for it.

So the IPS monitor is the best monitor for photography mainly for two reasons:

  • Allows you to play a very large number of colors (close to 100% of the color space sRGB),
  • Provides a visual angle very high.


VA is another good technology
, but it is not used as much. Similar to IPS panels, this type of technology utilizes a minimum of 8 bit technology, provides good coverage and the colors are not distorted when shown at different angles.

Matte screen or Glossy Screen?

Glossy Screen

Matte screen

Indoors, the glossy can still reflect a great deal of light.

If you make a turn at any electronics store, you’ll notice how the monitors of portable and those for fixed computer screens have glossy screens.

The glossy appearance favors the contrast and vibrancy of colors and is designed for the use of the computer that is dedicated to the entertainment, but unfortunately, as far as sexy may seem, these monitors have several disadvantages that are particularly evident in photographic work.

For example, the glossy screens reflect the sources of light and even the shapes of what lies in front of the monitor, by altering the perception of what is shown, saturation and contrast do not correspond to the content of the photo, especially once it is printed.

The monitor is not glossy are said matte. They are easily recognizable in each case, you’ve worked a monitor of this type.

If you buy on the internet, you can’t recognize at a glance if a monitor is matte or glossy. You should be able to discover by looking between the technical characteristics or possibly looking for on Google the name of the monitor associated with the word glossy.

My advice:

If they will be shown on just one screen, both of them are no problems. If they will be utilized for print, then opt for matte, which will have better saturation as a result of the glossy screens. Glossy is not the same as what you will get with print.

Bit depth LUT

Monitor display calibration is limited no matter what model you own. Owners of digital monitors should resist any changes from the factory settings because this can result in a loss of colors and shades. One way to counteract this is by buying a monitor with a higher bit depth LUT. This not only affects the specificity of the calibration, but also allows the monitor to utilize more colors in its display.

Bit depth LUT

Note: Since the input values for the display remain the same, a higher bit depth LUT will not display more colors at the same time. A video card with a higher bit depth LUT will not improve accuracy of calibrations if not paired with a similarly equipped monitor.

In a system with a low bit depth, the darkest (1) and the brightest (4) shades merge with white (5) and black (0) because the shades themselves are rounded up or down to the closest output available. A system with a high bit depth LUT does not need to round shades to the closest output value that can use additional intermediate values. Because of this increased precision, posterization of image and color banding are not a problem for even the oldest and most color-changed displays.

Most currently available monitors have 8-bit LUT, though 6-bit and higher 10-bit LUT’s are also on the market. For most purposes, 8-bit options deliver quality calibrations and clearer, color-true pictures. There are also monitors, usually LCD and marketed specifically to gamers, that sacrifice bit depth LUT for higher refresh rates. This process is the quick change of animated graphics in that many games with more quality and smoothness, but is no importance for those interested in viewing photos and still graphics.

Standard Gamut or Wide Gamut (Extended Gamut)?

RGBAll physical devices have restrictions when it comes to the types of colors that it can provide. An inkjet printer does not have the ability to produce a better shade of yellow than what is provided by the ink cartridge. The shade of red that your monitor shows is restricted by the hardware that is utilized in the LCD panel. This is known as the device’s color gamut.

A majority of monitors have a color gamut that matches the SRGB color gamut. You might already know that the sRGB color gamut does not have as much as the more commonly utilized Adobe 1998 version. Also, a lot of the Adobe colors that can be printed via your inkjet printer are actually not in the range of the SRGB colors. As a result, your camera can provide these colors and they can be printed with your printer. However, you cannot see them on your monitor. Basically, you will view an estimate of these colors because they are restricted by the monitor’s color gamut.

Wide gamut monitors get rid of this issue because what they have is matched up with a bigger amount of what the Adobe 1998 has. You can find this amount in the monitor’s specs. The benefit of this is that you can view colors in your pictures that look brighter than the regular gamut monitor. This gives you the ability to see all of the colors in your pictures.

It is best to have a wide gamut display because this is the way of the future. This is practically what is available right now. To utilize this type of display, you have to know about color managed workflows and possess a display that has the right calibration. You also have to utilize a color managed app such as Photoshop. This is not that hard to manage, but you have to know exactly what you are doing in order to be successful with it.

How to choose:

Depending on your photo and graphic display and editing needs, you need to choose a monitor that covers the sRGB spectrum and possibly the Adobe RPG spectrum as well. The first specification is found on every single quality monitor on the market today.

The sRGB spectrum is more than sufficient for web-based photographs and all graphics that are intended to be displayed on a monitor in their final form. For artists that print their work, the Adobe RPG spectrum capable monitor will result in better clarity, color correctness and ultimately higher-quality work.

Currently, nearly all monitor can cover more than 99% of the sRGB spectrum however not all of them can cover most of the Adobe RGB spectrum.

LED Monitors

You are entering the market monitor LCD backlit LED. in this case too there are different types, corresponding to different acronyms.

For photographic use, ask attention to buy a monitor RGB LED and not el-wled . The second option does not provide a color reproduction sufficiently faithful.

Viewing Angle

The first LCD monitor for your computer suffered from an angle of view very reduced. What does that mean?

With a reduced visual angle, moving left to right, top or bottom with respect to the central axis of the monitor, the colors are transformed and the contrast changes . You can imagine how it is absolutely recommended in a monitor to use for photo retouching.

The monitor of more recent production, allow you to move to the right or to the left relative to the monitor without noting obvious changes in the image. Choose a monitor with at least 120° of visual angle horizontal and possibly the same for the vertical.

Resolution

On this aspect there is little to say, the available resolutions are not a lot, especially, the resolution is also determined by the size of the diagonal.

For a monitor by 23 or 24 inches, the size that I advised before, do not fall under a native resolution of 1920 * 1200. Recalls that LCD monitors should be always used to their resolution, so don’t think you can use a resolution higher or lower than the one specified.

Should You Buy a 4K monitor?

Any full-size image on a 4K monitor will be displayed with enough detail and beauty for a photographer’s appreciation. Your palettes tools can also be set to an incredible number.

These pictures also require the ability to zoom in and out in a photo editing program like Photoshop and also to display text and fonts clearly and at the correct size. This differs from standard video, television or gaming monitor usage.

Most computer software applications are designed to make use of full high definition resolutions, which results in text that is easily viewed from a standard distance away. In 4K format, text minimizes to an uncomfortable level in the same programs and software apps.

4K is becoming highly active in the 2016 market but this display technology is outpacing some of the older programs that people still use every day. If you combine software usage from even two or three years ago with the new 4K option, the size of your text will be unreadable. This makes for very difficult computing and a lot of frustration between modern technology usage and keeping older but not yet obsolete software.

In order to get the best benefit from 4K, you need to make sure that the programs you use work well with it. Many of the standard Windows applications work well with 4K already although some Windows desktop ecosystems may lag behind this technology.

By far the most popular graphics and photography editing software, Adobe Photoshop, is already working well with 4K displays. Even the largest pictures can be viewed with full detail at high resolutions and in actual size without the need to zoom in or out or scroll the workspace. The entire Photoshop interface scales easily so you have no problem accessing all your favorite tools and palettes. If you are regularly engaged in photography or graphics editing or work with videos, a 4K monitor is virtually essential.

To conclude, my personal opinion is that the 4K display capabilities are very attractive but not quite yet practical for all uses. In your excitements about this new technology, it is still important to hang back a bit and make sure all your existing hardware and the programs you use regularly work with the 4K monitor before you purchase one.

Digital connection

Now all of the monitors should be equipped with a digital connection, HDMI or DVI. Be careful not to buy a fund of magazine that has only the VGA.

Also, check which ports are available on your computer. Don’t worry, however: adapters exist able to convert any format.

Best Monitor recommended for photo editing

Monitors that incorporate all the features that i listed abut on prices between 100$ to 2000$.

With a little patience, however, you can find offers that will make saving a few dozen dollars. As I wrote before, if your budget is tight, of the features that I have described can find a compromise on size, but not on the other.

My recommend:

Here are some models that I have identified are looking for a monitor for you.

Disclaimer: Clicking on a “Details on Amazon” link will bring to you to the appropriate Amazon.com product listing, where you can check the price, customer reviews and more information about the product or similar products.

66 Comments - Leave a comment
  1. Gerard Keyes says:

    Thank you for sharing all of this general and technical information. I wasn’t sure where to start in selecting a monitor for photo editing and printing photos. Your experience and above information in this field is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

  2. Alok JR says:

    thanks for the detail information and suggestions. I used this as a base for all my thanksgiving research and purchase. I bought Dell P2415Q from Amazon for $ 350.00

  3. Aga says:

    Grand work, Author! Big thank you for sharing your findings here.

  4. sahil says:

    please suggest 24 inch dell model for video & photo editing in budget price, having matte screen & full hd display, price between 200$ to 270$

  5. YVES says:

    WOOOOH THIS INFO IS ABSOLUTE GOLD , HOURS AND HOURS , REALLY THANK YOU SO MUCH

    OUTSTANDING WORK , AND GIVING IT AWAY IN A WORLD WHICH CHARGES FOR EVEN AIR

    WISH YOU ALL THE BEST
    KIND REGARDS

  6. Retha Van Straaten says:

    Good Day
    I am starting with Photographyand i have a Mecer 23.6 Wide LED monitor. I am not sure if it will be okay to use to do editing on? Any advice will be welcome.
    Thank you

  7. Roshini says:

    Sorry meant to say a BIG THANK YOU for the
    extensive research and info provided.
    I learnt a great deal. However now in a quandary as to what I should purchase on a limited budget of Zar 2000 max or less.
    Help

  8. Roshini says:

    Hi!I am have just started with my photography
    business. Currently not in a position to spend a great deal on a monitor.
    I have a Dell N5010 NOTEBOOK , I5.
    I need a compatible Dell monitor which costs around ZAR 2000 max or less.
    I found second hand Dell
    S2440l for ZAR1500.
    THE reason I am holding back on purchasing is due to the glossy screen instead of Matt.
    Please help.

  9. Thomas says:

    Hi, many thanks for this impressive review. It really helps during the selection process .. The two high-end BenQ models are rather similar and I’m hesitant, any comparative advices ?
    BenQ SW2700PT or BenQ BL2711U ?
    Thank –

  10. James Swick says:

    Thanks with much appreciation. You saved me a ton of time and gave me the assurance I purchased the best product for my needs.

  11. Klark Kent says:

    Hi, It is very informative and I’d like to thank you. In my country prices’ of 27″ dell u2713h and asus pa 249q are very close. I am a new born photographer and I am gonna buy new monitor. Unfortunately asus pa279q is out of my range and there is no satisfactory comparison between them. I need user reviews especially who has experiences with both. Think that you are in my shoes, what you are going to buy? u2713h or asus pa 249q?

    • Klark Kent says:

      Updated Question:
      It seems Dell does not continue to manufacture 2713H. New substitute of it is UP2716D. Now Asus PA249Q or Dell UP2716D?

  12. Lane says:

    The Asus PA249Q is listed in the comparison chart as a 27″ monitor when in fact it is a 24″ monitor. I’m so disappointed. The Asus sounds like a real monitor for the money but I wanted a 27″ monitor at 1920X1200. Just.an FYI.

  13. Donald Fisher says:

    I see comments far back to January of 2014. Have these details been updated to reflect 2016 information? Thanks for the work!

    • admin says:

      Yes, we update the information every month, I’m glade to hear you like my article.

  14. Dimi says:

    Thanks for the great info!
    What about bigger screens ? 40+ inches
    I’m using my TV in the living room for my desktop display and want to change it with a pro level photo editing screen but also want to watch TV on it using my HDMI connected sky box. Are there any good options on the market regardless of the price?

  15. Chris says:

    You’re write up includes reference to glossy screens, however your list of recommended monitors only shows matte screens, why is this. Are there any 4K glossy screen monitors you can recommend similar to iMac retina which My son has and is excellent, way better for photos than my matte screen.

  16. habbaz says:

    Thanks.
    what about the “HP Pavilion 23xw” is it good for Graphic editing? and how much sRGB have?

  17. Roz Brownlie says:

    That is fantastic information. Is there any advice regarding a good laptop? My current one has THE worst colour calibration and I would like to invest in a new one that gives me much better colour and clarity. I’d love to own a Mac, but not possible as the laptop will be connected to business computers that are PCs.

    • Austin says:

      You can run Windows side-by-side with MacOS.

      • Austin says:

        Also, note that according to tests performed by laptopmag, the new 12″ macbook has the best color gamut and delta-E, followed closely by Pro 13 and then Pro 15, with both Air models trailing significantly.

  18. Tim Christokat says:

    Great arricle. How do rate the LG 31MU97Z-B 78,74cm 31″ for video and photography work?

    • Tim Christokat says:

      Great article. How do you rate the LG 31MU97Z-B 78, 31″ for video and photography work?

  19. amanda says:

    Excellent, thank you! Saved me so much time.

    I like to support bloggers who provide great info, unfortunately though this time, I wasn’t able to purchase via your links because I needed international shipping & the Amazon suppliers of the models I wanted didn’t ship…. so I clicked your ads! ha ha. Thanks.

  20. Tejas says:

    Thnx for an informative article
    I’m begginer in this photo editing field
    plz guide me for a monitor & my budget is not more than $100 to $130

  21. John says:

    Hi,
    Thank’s for a very interesting and informative article. How would you rate the Acer CB240HYK for photo and video editing.

    Thanks,
    John.

  22. Sivaraj says:

    HI..

    Thank you so much for making a very useful content for those who is at the beginning stage..

    Siva

  23. Vicki says:

    I disagree about big screens. Hate them! Same about big TVs. 21″ is fine for me.

  24. K Watson says:

    Hi, thank you for your very detailed analysis. I have a particular that I hope you can help me with. I have dabbled in Photography for years but am planning to go professional very soon.

    My problem: I am disabled with MS and spinal issues that both force me to do my photo editing in bed on a laptop. I have done a monitor calibration but still have issues, of course, with contrast and prints looking overly edited at times.

    Are there ANY laptop monitors that would work better than others? What laptop monitor specs should I look for.

    Thank you very much again for all of the great info that you provide.

  25. Pantelis Mor says:

    Hello from Greece,

    Nice job. I learn a lot from your article. I want to buy a monitor for photo edit.

    I saw these monitors
    Dell UltraSharp U2715H for 550 euro
    BenQ GW2765HT for 450 euro
    Asus PB278QR for 490 euro

    I think for Benq. It’s the cheapest. What are the difference between these models ? is it worth to pay about 100 euro more for the dell ??

    Thx

  26. Lorena Cerisano says:

    Your information is very informative.
    I’m almost ready to purchase monitor but need clarification on a few things per your review.
    I’ve narrowed my decision to 3 monitors. Need your input please.
    1) You have ViewSonic 23 inch but don’t mention the ViewSonic VP2770-LED 27-Inch. Any reason why this 27″ is not listed?
    2) Would you consider this ViewSonic VP2770-LED 27-Inch a better monitor for photo editing compared to the BenQ GW2765HT? pros and cons.
    3) Also, what are pros and cons for these 2: BenQ GW2765HT or BenQ BL3200PT
    Thank you!

  27. DPC says:

    The Samsung S32D850T is awesome, though to avoid contrast shift problems the monitor needs to be 36 to 40 inches away from the eye. Have it closer and contrast shift will start to cause blooming and even minor hue shift. At 3~3.5 feet away the colors are visibly identical to the Dell U2713HM next to it.

    If you can tolerate being three to 3.5 feet away from the monitor, the added contrast is a real boon; the Dell pales by comparison (pun not intended). Though with the Dell, one can be 2 feet away or closer.

  28. MANOJ NAYAK says:

    Shop No. 201, II Flor All Hatami Complex Shoping Center

  29. Norbert Drage says:

    Well-written article in terms of content, but I’m a little surprised that neither Eizo’s nor NEC’s professional offerings made it into your shortlist.

    The features like colour space, colour calibration, build quality, accessories (hoods, calibration spiders, etc.) as well as connectors (most will use DisplayPort as standard) are geared towards professionals and the only real thing holding these back from even more wide-spread adoption is the price..

  30. Rishab says:

    Hello, thanks for the wonderful article. I’m an amateur photographer and looking for a job in the field of management. As a hobby am doing photography and I hope one day I’ll be able to make some money from it. I have a normal laptop on which I work on my photos using photoshop and camera raw. I’m looking for an HD screen in low budget, so I would request you to kindly suggest me a screen (or 2) which are good for me at this stage. I would go by your suggestion for the size and brand, but it must be good and cheap too. My preferred budget is US$100 but I can go up by not more than $150. I believe I can get a good screen in this budget. If you talk about my interest, I was looking for an IPS HD screen and one of my friends recommended me Dell 2240L IPS monitor. Please suggest me a good IPS HD LED screen for my post processing work. I would be grateful to you. You can email me or post your reply here. FYI, I use Nikon D3200 and I have a 50mm prime lens, Tamron 18-200mm lens and a tripod. I’m also looking forward to a Wide angle lens (Tokina 11mm).
    Thanks.

    • DPC says:

      For IPS, go for the Dell U2713HM. Compared to the U3014 (also AH-IPS) the U2713HM has slightly better contrast, better response time, and is 50% less in price. These two models have had some users complaining of image retention. But both exceed your $150 limit.

      The Dell S2440L? I used one. It’s great. And is about $200 (less by now). It’s an AMVA panel, probably, but the 24″ screen size negates a lot of issues with 32″ AMVA panels that have to sit farther back before contrast or hue shift are noticed.

  31. Alex says:

    Thanks a ton for a super informative article!! I was wondering if a lot of these same properties, requirements, or tips would apply to video editing as well. I work with photography often but video even more. A lot of the models you have described here have shown up in my research as well (I’m in the $200-$500 range). Do you know anything about video editing monitors, or if any one model here has features that would help it perform best that you would recommend? Thanks, Alex.

    • Clay says:

      They’re pretty much the same with photo and video editing, it’s the color and pixels that matter. I use the Dell P2415Q 4k for editing video. Remember that video is just moving pictures so many of the same principles apply.

  32. Jose A. says:

    Very valuable information as I go from a vague understanding to a working knowledge on how to select a monitor that suits my photo editing needs. Thank you!

  33. JJ says:

    hello, sorry I’m having a hard time understanding the English in this article. The sentences are not very easy to understand. Just some friendly advice! Maybe needs a little editing.

  34. Hi from Greece! Very good article!
    I am professional photographer and i currently work with an 2010 iMac 27”. I want to change screen and go for a matte finish. Do you think that Samsung WQHD S32D850T has better color accuracy from my iMac monitor? Consider that i am calibration with external hardware calibrator every 2 months and my work is studio advertising photography.
    Thank you.

    • DPC says:

      Your iMac, depending on year of manufacture, typically uses the same AH-IPS that the Dell equivalent to the time uses.

      About the Samsung – the S32D850T is great once calibrated, and IF you keep it three feet or more away from you as contrast shift (and even hue shift) can occur if placed too closely to you (e.g. 24″ has obvious contrast shift issues and even slight hue shift.)

      Keep it 36+” away and you will not see any visible difference in hue to an AH-IPS panel. You will see deeper black and more lush imagery, which is a sight to behold. Especially at night, or when taking DSLR snapshots to illustrate the differences, 3000:1 vs 1000:1 shows a very respectable difference.

      The only other issue with that Samsung, as with all other 32″ models using AMVA panels, is that there is a vertical banding problem in many units due to a manufacturing issue. A third in from each side, a band can be seen under certain circumstances and might show up while playing games. I’ve seen such banding on cheaper 40″ TVs as well. Size seems to be an issue with the chance of greater issues such as this. The larger the screen tends to increase the chances of visible banding. Even my Dell U2713HM here has banding, but one really has to look hard to find it.

      The Samsung S32D850T definitely deserves to be on the list of best monitor for photo editing.

  35. Roger Brookstein says:

    Most interesting and helpful review, thank you. Desk space is limited so which of your recommendations can be wall mounted please?

  36. Robbo says:

    U2713HM is not a wide gamut display, but the U2713H is.

  37. Colleen says:

    What about the HP Pavilion 27xi 27-Inch IPS LED Backlit Monitor
    CDN$ 337.21 Is it better than the BenQ GW Series GW2760HS 27-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor

  38. Craig Burrows says:

    Thank you for a very good review. After spending a long time researching it is this page that was most informative. Now I just hope I made the right purchase.

  39. Adeline says:

    Hi, Thanks so much for this article.
    Dell released new 4K monitor P2415Q, I cant find difference between this one and Dell UP2414Q other then the price.
    I would use it for photography, editing. It is an investment for me but I dont want to waste money on the same result, which one would you vote for?

    • Jane says:

      The UP2414Q has Premier Color; essentially it’s targeted at professional photographers and others that need what’s called a wide Gamut to their color sensitive work, or at least an increased accuracy to the available color gamut range.
      If your not going to be doing important work on the monitor that relies on very accurate color reproduction, go ahead and pick up the cheaper P2415Q without worrying much about it – it will still be a pretty amazing monitor.

    • I’m just returning a Dell 4K UP2414Q, because it CONTINUALLY stays in sleep mode, after only 3 days of trying to get it set up. The reviews I’ve read in Dell’s website are full of this same comment. My 2nd. choice is ASUS 4K PB287Q…but it has a TN panel instead of the IPS that I need for photography and graphics work. I don’t know what to do. I’d try a Dell replacement of the same but with so many like reviews, I hate to take the chance. Ideas?

      • Adeline says:

        I know, I read the reviews and they all say the same. They didnt release an update of the software that does that..
        I really need an accurate color, and the performance.. but anything comparable costs a lot more. And this one is not working perfectly either.. same problem..

  40. Andreas says:

    Hello

    Appreciate the article.

    Which Dell monitor is better for Photoshop editing: U2713HM or UZ2715H?

    thank you

  41. Shelly says:

    What is your opinion about using a Samsung 32″ 5203 LED TV for editing?

  42. Tobias says:

    Very well done article,it really covered everything I needed to know. I’ve looked around and bought the Dell UP2414Q from your advice since I am limited to 24″ due to space on my desk and it seemed like the best one. Thanks for writing this!

  43. gat says:

    are you sure it’s an ASUS VG248QE not an ASUS PA248QJ? VG is a TN panel, while PA is the IPS panel?

  44. Refit says:

    Thanks, this is useful. However I don’t understand how Dell 2412M is in your list of best buys. It goes against all your parameters – it is 6 bit, uses WLED, and covers only 71% of NTSC colours.

  45. Nuno Oliveira says:

    I really apreciate all these information, acording to your recomendation would you buy the Dell UltraSharp U2412M ? it is not to big, is a 16:10 ratio, 100% srgb coverage and 99% adobe rgb. my only doupt is if the 1000:1/300 Nits are enough.
    I hope you can anwer 🙂

  46. Depewmad says:

    Great article Major help in making it easier to find a good monitor
    Thanks!!

  47. Akshay says:

    Hi,
    I really appreciate this write up. It is very detailed and informative. Very good comparison of different markets that are currently available in market. Thanks for making photographer’s lives easier.

    I will appreciate if you can comment on a monitor I am looking at I loved the features.
    Asus PA279Q 27″

  48. Alain Desgroseilliers says:

    This very interesting article will help me to find the best monitor for my photography viewing

  49. Barry says:

    I am very pleased I can across this article.

  50. miguel Vasq says:

    thank you for such a good article. The technical info is very valuable and make photographers to make better choices.

  51. Jay says:

    Hi, I would like to thank you for such an informative write up. It was exactly what I was looking for. Well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*


Pinterest