Comparing the APS-C sensor from the Fuji X-T1 versus the full frame Nikon DF may seem like a losing battle. A camera twice as heavy and expensive should beat the X-T1 in all sections except in portability and the damage to the pocketbook. However, the editor of the blog Soundimageplus David Taylor-Hugues has not hesitated to compare both cameras in a of high ISO battle.
Nikon DF vs Fuji X-T1: ISO 3200
Nikon DF vs Fuji X-T1: ISO 6400
Above is one of the clips detailing 100% of the comparison, a total of three: A ISO 3200, ISO 6400 and ISO 25600, JPEGs direct from the camera. With the Nikon DF they used a Nikon AF-S 24-85mm, 3.5-4G ED VR versus a Fujinon XF 18-55mm f / 2.8-4 R LM OIS from the Fuji X-T1. Both lenses had a fixed aperture set to f/4. You can see the rest of the examples on the Soundimageplus webpage.
Nikon DF vs Fuji X-T1: ISO 25600
The author of the test is clear: the Nikon DF has more detail in each of the examples but the excellent results of the X-T1 are surprising. To the extent that they claim to be "the best high quality ISO images" he has seen in a APS-C format camera.
Even then, they note the different "interpretation" of the ISO values of Fuji vs. Nikon: approximately half past exposure for the latter something that can quite distort some tests if not taken into account.
In conclusion, consider the Fuji X-T1 can be used perfectly for as a "workhorse" professional for any task. In his opinion, you would have to look very carefully to "see significant differences" in prints images at high ISO from Nikon DF and Fuji X DF-T1.
Even though for marketing reasons NEX brand has stayed on the middle of the road, the main character of our analysis is the spiritual heir of the Sony NEX-6, one of the best surprises of last year in the CSC sector. With the A6000, the Japanese brand wants to consolidate itself in the market of the users that search for the newest generation of technology and high quality pictures without having to carry a reflex.
“If it Works, don’t touch it” says the technology maxim that Sony appears to have put in practice while developing its new camera. The chassis is practically identical to that of the NEX-6, although the handle is bigger to improve ergonomy, the assembly is improved and on an aesthetic level, the bets are on the straight lines that already characterize Sony’s new series and that give them an elegant touch that suits them very well.
What is the Samsung Galaxy K Zoom? A camera? A smartphone? A plane? Superman? We had the same question when we reviewed this phone’s predecessor, the Samsung Galaxy S4 Zoom, and we’ll see at the end of this review if we can arrive at an answer. Because it’s hard to say.
It was especially hard to answer that question for the S4 Zoom, which was a good attempt by Samsung to get the public used to these kinds of phone-camera hybrids. However, its design was far from making it an attractive, easy-to-use day-to-day device, at least as a mobile telephone.
You might understand the public’s joy upon hearing that the Korean company has made an effort to change its design in the Galaxy K Zoom, which is much easier to use and infinitely more comfortable in your pocket than the previous model.
The reviews received for the first PowerShot G1 X left a tough outlook for its successor. It was not an easy task, but Canon made note of all the comments received and, with this new revision G1 X Mark II, has blown the rest. We must talk about our experience with it and its features.
A few weeks ago, we had the exclusive opportunity to unbox the new G1 Mark II, the new Canon trademark vessel in the PowerShot range. Now, we must put to the test its final version, a model that promises to give a lot to talk about in the next few months. These were our impressions on it.
Two years of work and a lot to improve on
The PowerShot G1 X, introduced in 2012 as the first of the G kind with a CMOS sensor, measured an inch and a half, only 20% smaller than an APS-C that low-end reflex cameras have.
That model consisted of a 28-112 mm optic (equivalent 35 mm) with a brightness of 1:2,5-5,8. However, price-wise, it competed with the mid-range reflex cameras and with interchangeable-objective compact models. Its zoom range and brightness were modest for a model of its category, its AF precision needed improvement, and its flash performance was limited to 6 pictures at 4.5 fps. There was a lot of criticism about this camera, but it seems that Canon was listening to the consumers.
During this month of May we have been lucky enough to try out one of the most interesting models of the latest batch of Sony: the Sony A5000. We are before the entry model of spectrum of the popular CSC of the brand, with a very competitive price. We have also to highlight that it is presented as the smallest and lightest camera with APS-C sensor and interchangeable optics of the market.
We have to be honest, the Sony A5000 surprises because of its small size and its lightness. The sensation as we grab it is that what we have in our hands is a prototype model. It is however a camera with a CMOS sensor size APS-C, like many Reflex, with a Bionz X processor, which is the same as the one from the last A7 or A7r, one of the most powerful of the market.
It is very well designed, and even if it is small, one has no trouble using it even with big hands. The buttons are where they need to be in order to avoid weird contortionisms with the hands. The trick is that it breathes from its four flanks the essence of the old NEX, whose culmination point was model NEX7. Now, the NEX denomination has disappeared in favor of ALPHA. Everything stays the same, with the image quality that has been its main source of success.
The section in which smartphone manufacturers are mostly focusing efforts is to improve their cameras. Especially in the high end models, because that is the feature that marks the difference between high end and low end phones.
It is perhaps because of this, Samsung faced with the S5, the challenge to overcome the quality and performance of the camera from its previous version, the Galaxy S4, one of the most balanced we’ve seen on a mobile device. We must also overcome, or at least match, the photographic abilities of the top rivals: iPhone 5s, HTC One (M8), the high end Nokia Lumias, the Sony Xperia Z2 and some Chinese devices.
We were invited to try the new camera of Leica at the company’s site in Los Angeles, U.S.A. We have been privileged to have in our hands this valuable camera that has been in the make in the last two years. This German manufacturer has incorporated the trendy “touch screens”, without leaving behind all the other important factors that set this camera among the high ones. The design, elegance and quality are all present in this new Leica T.
This is a very common question, and the answer isn’t easy. The best thing to do is analyze their advantages and shortcomings separately.
I can’t count the times I’ve been asked this question, that’s why I’m writing this article. I hope this can be of help to everyone asking themselves this.
Both programs allow us to work with our pictures, but they don’t do the same, or at least in the same way. The purpose is the same, but the means are different.
Lightroom has a much more modern and user-friendly interface . In a way it is a summary of Photoshop , it is the poor son . But it would be a very brief way to explain it . Although it may seem crazy to say so, it seems the fruit of a wild orgy between some programs Adobe suite , as if their codes had been crossed and had given birth to a son endowed with some of its virtues but with some limitations .
Most mirrorless cameras in APS-C format are able to take a great photo. The Sony a6000 reaches this sector increasingly crowded with the intention of highlighting a handful of new tricks and updated technology, but it is too similar to the camera it replaces, the 2012 Sony NEX-6.
What is it?
The Sony NEX series may be gone, but it has only been done as a trade name. Its excellent cameras are very much alive under the umbrella of the Alpha (a) range. The a6000 is a mirrorless camera with mid-range sensor of 24 megapixel and APS-C size, and the E-Mount from Sony. It costs $650 USD body only and $800 USD with a 16-50 mm f / 3,5-5,6 lens.
Why is it important?
It is the first camera restructured Alpha line pointing to a higher input level (not counting , of course, the powerful Alpha a7 and A7R full format). It is important because it replaces the NEX -6 and probably also the NEX -7, which was revolutionary when it came out in 2011.
The new Nikon D610 is described as a model that overcomes the serious mistakes caused by the D600, related to oil stains in the sensors. This new model shows what Nikon and their Full Frame models are capable of.
The new Nikon D610 is the response to the errors caused by the previous model, the Nikon D600, which had oil stains on the sensor. If you own a D600, you can take it to a customer service center so they give you a D610.
The technical specs show this is a high-performance model with a Full Frame CMOS sensor with a 35.9x24mm size and a resolution of 24.3MP, just like the Sony A7. The EXPEED 3 processor has an ISO range of 50-25600.
It features a burst mode of 6fps capable of maintaining this speed constantly. The 3.2-inch LCD screen has a 921000-pixel resolution, the second best on the market (the best so far is 1040000 pixels). Sadly, it doesn’t have tilting system, despite not being a product aimed at videographers.