Best Monitor for Photo Editing and Video Editing: All You Should Know (December 2017)

If you are a digital photographer, you will need a computer and a monitor to see your photos in order to evaluate or retouch them. And if you want a job well done, as often happens in photography, you can’t use just any monitor, you have to choose a Monitor for Photo Editing with care.

Monitor for Photo Editing

This may mean knowing how to decipher mysterious new acronyms and compare technical characteristics that seem to be made to be understood only by an engineer.

Of course you can find monitors that are extremely costly, designed for professionals with deeper pockets. But luckily there are affordable alternatives that are, in any case, a leap in quality when compared to the monitor based on a laptop or a desktop computer.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing recommendation:

Monitors that incorporate all the features that I listed about on prices between 100$ to 2000$.

With a little patience, however, you can find offers that will make saving a few dozen dollars. As I wrote before, if your budget is tight, of the features that I have described can find a compromise on size, but not on the other.

Disclaimer: Clicking on a “Details on Amazon” link will bring to you to the appropriate Amazon.com product listing, where you can check the price, customer reviews and more information about the product or similar products.

 Price and Reviews on AmazonScreen Size/ Type
Resolution
Color
Refresh rate
Response Time
Bit Depth
Pixel Pitch
(Smaller is Better)
Color Gamut
Wide Color Gamut
Price above $1000
NEC PA322UHDDetails on Amazon / B&H Photo31.5"/IPS/Matte
3840×2160 (4K)
1.07 billion
Up to 120Hz (@1080p)
60Hz @ Full UHD
10 ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.18 mm 100% sRGB
99.2% Adobe RGB
Benq SW320Details on Amazon31.5″, IPS (Matte)
3840×2160 (4K)
1.07 billion
Full UHD 60Hz@ Full UHD;
5 ms;
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.233mm100% SRGB;
99% Adobe RGB
Dell UP3216QDetails on Amazon34″/ IPS/Matte
3840×2160 (4K)
1.07 billion
60Hz@Full UHD
6 ms
10-bit color depth +12 bit LUT
0.182mm100% SRGB
99.5% Adobe RGB
ASUS PA329QDetails on Amazon32"/IPS/Matte
3840×2160 (4K)
1.07 billion
60Hz @ Full UHD
5ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.1845mm100% sRGB
99.5% Adobe RGB
Price Between $500 and $1000
NEC PA272W Go to B&H Photo27“/AH-IPS(Matte)/Matte
2560×1440
1.07 billion
60h@2560 x 1440
6 ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.23mm100% SRGB
99.3% Adobe RGB
LG 31MU97CDetails on Amazon27"/ips/Matte
4096×2160(Cinema 4K)
1.07 billion
60hz
5 ms
10 bit
0.1701mm 100% sRGB
99.5% Adobe RGB
ViewSonic VP2785Details on Amazon27“/IPS/Matte
3840×2160
1.07 billion
60Hz@3840×2160
7 ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.233mm100% SRGB;
99% Adobe RGB
Dell U3417W Details on Amazon32“/IPS/Matte Curved
3440 x 1440
1.07 billion
60hz@2560 x 1440
6 ms
8 bit color depth (10 bit via FRC)
0.23mm99% sRGB;
Adobe RGB: No data
BenQ PV270Details on Amazon27″, IPS/Matte
2560 x 1440
1.07 billion
72 Hz @2560 x 1440
5 ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.233‎ mm100% SRGB;
99% Adobe RGB
BenQ PD3200U
(Great for CAD/CAM)
Details on Amazon32“/IPS/Matte
3840×2160
1.07 billion
3840 x 2160@60Hz
6ms
10-bit color depth
0.311‎ mmsRGB 100%
LG 34UC88
(Great for Gaming and photo editing)
Details on Amazon / B&H Photo32“/IPS/Matte
3840×2160
1.07 billion
3440 X 1440@60Hz
75Hz with AMD FreeSync
5ms;
8-bit color (10 bit via FRC)
0.2628mmsRGB>99%
99%;
Adobe RGB 76%
Dell P2415QDetails on Amazon24“/IPS/Matte
3840×2160(4K)
1.07 billion
3840 x 2160 @ 60Hz
5ms;
8 bit color (10 bit via FRC)
0.13725 mm 99% sRGB
79% AdobeRGB
BenQ SW2700PTDetails on Amazon27"/ips/Matte
2560x1440
1.07 billion
60Hz
5 ms
10-bit color depth +14 bit LUT
0.233mm100% sRGB
99% Adobe RGB
LG 34UC98Details on Amazon34"/IPS/Matte (curved panel)
3440 x 1440
1.07Billion
75Hz
5 ms
6 BIt color depth
0.2325 mmsRGB > 99%
76% Adobe RGB
LG 27UD88Details on Amazon27"/ips/Matte
3840 x 2160
1.07 billion
60Hz
5 ms
10-bit color depth
0.1554mm99.5% sRGB
78% Adobe RGB
Dell U3415W Details on Amazon34"/ips/Matte (curved panel)
3440×1440
1.07 billion
60Hz
5 ms
8-bit color depth
0.233 mm100% sRGB
78% Adobe RGB
BenQ BL2711UDetails on Amazon27”/IPS/Matte
3840 x 2160
1.07 billion
60Hz
4 ms
8-bit color depth
0.155mm100% sRGB
No Adobe RGB Support
Price Between $200 and $500
Samsung S32D850TDetails on Amazon32”/AMVA+/Matte
2560×1440
1.07 billion
60Hz
5 ms
color depth (No provide)
0.2767mm100% sRGB
70.3% Adobe RGB
LG 34UM68 (UltraWide, with FreeSync)Details on Amazon34"/IPS/Matte
2560x1080
16.7 million
Up to 75 Hz
5 ms
8 BIt color depth
0.311mmsRGB 99%
No Adobe RGB Support
BenQ GW2765HTDetails on Amazon27"/IPS/Matte
2560×1440;
1.07 billion
2560×1440@ 60Hz
4 ms
8 bit color (10 bit via FRC)
0.233mm100% sRGB
79.1% Adobe RGB
ASUS PA248QDetails on Amazon24"/IPS/Matte
1920×1200
16.7 million
60Hz
6 ms
6 bit color(8 bit via FRC)
0.270mm100% sRGB
74.3% AdobeRGB
Philips 276E6ADSS Details on Amazon27”/IPS/Matte
1920x1200
16.7 million
60Hz
5 ms
6 bit color (8 bit via FRC)
0.311mm100% sRGB
99% Adobe RGB
Dell Ultrasharp U2417HJDetails on Amazon23.8"/IPS/Matte
1920×1080
16.7 million
60Hz
5 ms
6 bit color(8 bit via FRC)
0.2745 mm100% sRGB
No Adobe RGB Support
Acer G257HU Great for Photo Editing and GamingDetails on Amazon25"/IPS/Matte
2560×1440
16.7 million
60Hz
4 ms
6 bit color (8 bit via FRC)
0.216mm100% sRGB
No Adobe RGB Support
Price under $200
Lenovo L24q Details on Amazon23.8″“/IPS/Matte
2560×1440
16.7 million
60Hz
4 ms
6 bit
No datesRGB 99%;
No Adobe RGB support
ViewSonic VX2370SMHDetails on Amazon23″"/IPS/Matte
1920×1080
16.7 million
60Hz
8 ms
8 Bit
No datesRGB 100%;
No Adobe RGB support
HP Pavilion 27xwDetails on Amazon27“/IPS/Matte
1920×1080
16.7 million
60Hz
8 ms
Color depth (No Provide)
0.311mmsRGB 98%
No Adobe RGB Support

Best Monitor for Photo Editing Buying Guide

In this article I introduce the main features to consider in the selection of a monitor for photography and photo editing.

Purchasing a new monitor may be particularly useful if you use a portable computer, as many people do today. Reading the characteristics which follow, you’ll discover how laptops concentrate all the negative aspects.

In addition, a good monitor for photograph must have the option to be calibrated. Calibrating the monitor on a laptop is usually more difficult and sometimes we do not do so precisely.

What are the characteristics to assess in the choice of the monitor?

As is the case for any technology product, if you start delving deep into the technical specifications for computer monitors it seems like the lists are as numerous as confetti. Fortunately, however, the number of features to keep in mind for photographic use is limited.

Let’s look at them one by one.

Size

This is an easy-to-understand feature, certainly, the larger monitor is better. The difficult part is deciding which is the minimum size that allows us to work comfortably while not spending too much.

When choosing a monitor for your computing needs, you should first think about your desk size, vision acuity and the distance you’re sitting from the monitor. People who struggle with a tiny 13 inch notebook screen not only invite eyestrain but also poor posture. Displaying a highly detailed photograph or other image on a small screen like this does not help you see how it really is supposed to look.

Most laptops have 15 inch screens, but this is hardly better than the smaller option. What you gain in convenience and portability forces you to lose out on display quality and comfort. Photographers and artists need a larger and higher quality display in order to properly view and edit their pictures.

From what I’ve read, and according to my personal experience, I would recommend you do not drop below 24 inches, 27″-32″ is a nice size for editing. If your budget is very tight you can settle for a 23-inch.

Monitors of this size are large enough to justify the expense. Furthermore, they allow you to view your pictures at a good level of magnification and simultaneously hold all the toolbars and panels typical of photo editing software and post-photographic production.

In particular, these dimensions relate to screens with proportions of 16:10. I believe the old 4:3 is no longer available, while the 16:9 favor the width too much when compared to the height and can make awkward access to functionality of the various programs.

The monitor’s 16:10 fits perfectly into pictures taken with the landscape orientation and also leave a generous amount of space for the various toolbars arranged vertically in many image editing programs.

Finally, this is the dimension that at the moment it offers the best price/performance ratio.

TN or IPS?

The Twisted Nematic (TN) is a very well known form of technology and it is also considered to be the oldest as well. Its best feature is that it gives short response times, which is why it is great for a gaming platform, but unfortunately is not good for a photographic use. When combined with LED lighting, a Twisted Nematic monitor can provide a lot of brightness and use less power than other technologies of its kind.

However, TN also has features that are not as advantageous. For instance, it has color distortions that happen when viewing wide angles. These monitors have 6 bit color technology. They are not able to show all the colors of the 24 bit color range that most video cards can show you, which add up to around 60 million colors. There are huge differences in certain products, but the ones that are on the low end will have a color for just the medium range angle changes. You will be able to recognize a Twisted Nematic monitor because of such color modifications, if you are looking at the picture from the top or from the sides.

In Plane Switching (IPS) is a contemporary technology that uses other types of technologies such as S-IPS, AS-IPS, H-IPS and E-IPS. The main reason that you want to use IPS panels is because they are either 8- or 10-bit technology. They produce a minimum of 125 percent of the colors that are available in the NTSC gamut. Also, these colors are not distorted when you look at them from various angles. The majority of them can be viewed well beyond 170 degrees. Previously, the only problem had to do with emphasizing the black colors, which usually meant that there were going to be some problems with the contrast. Also, IPS panels tend to be pricey and they are also slow at first.

Manufacturers have begun to produce Super IPS panels, but at cheaper prices. The response times have been reduced a lot and the contrast has been greatly enhanced. Also, the color display and the selections to calibrate the colors are a lot better than other panels of this kind. There is no distortion, even when you are viewing at shaper angles.

IPS monitors have not really been affordable, but the gap is starting to close. Just one year ago, most IPS monitors were three times expensive than the regular TN monitors. However, the 23 inch screens can be bought for around three hundred dollars these days. If you want professional graphic monitors that utilize IPS technology, you will have to still pay about a thousand dollars for it.

So the IPS monitor is the best monitor for photography mainly for two reasons:

  • Allows you to play a very large number of colors (close to 100% of the color space sRGB),
  • Provides a visual angle very high.

VA is another good technology, but it is not used as much. Similar to IPS panels, this type of technology utilizes a minimum of 8 bit technology, provides good coverage and the colors are not distorted when shown at different angles.

Matte screen or Glossy Screen?

Glossy Screen

Matte screen

Indoors, the glossy can still reflect a great deal of light.

If you make a turn at any electronics store, you’ll notice how the monitors of portable and those for fixed computer screens have glossy screens.

The glossy appearance favors the contrast and vibrancy of colors and is designed for the use of the computer that is dedicated to the entertainment, but unfortunately, as far as sexy may seem, these monitors have several disadvantages that are particularly evident in photographic work.

For example, the glossy screens reflect the sources of light and even the shapes of what lies in front of the monitor, by altering the perception of what is shown, saturation and contrast do not correspond to the content of the photo, especially once it is printed.

The monitor is not glossy are said matte. They are easily recognizable in each case, you’ve worked a monitor of this type.

If you buy on the internet, you can’t recognize at a glance if a monitor is matte or glossy. You should be able to discover by looking between the technical characteristics or possibly looking for on Google the name of the monitor associated with the word glossy.

My advice:

If they will be shown on just one screen, both of them are no problems. If they will be utilized for print, then opt for matte, which will have better saturation as a result of the glossy screens. Glossy is not the same as what you will get with print.

Bit depth LUT

Monitor display calibration is limited no matter what model you own. Owners of digital monitors should resist any changes from the factory settings because this can result in a loss of colors and shades. One way to counteract this is by buying a monitor with a higher bit depth LUT. This not only affects the specificity of the calibration, but also allows the monitor to utilize more colors in its display.

Bit depth LUT

Note: Since the input values for the display remain the same, a higher bit depth LUT will not display more colors at the same time. A video card with a higher bit depth LUT will not improve accuracy of calibrations if not paired with a similarly equipped monitor.

In a system with a low bit depth, the darkest (1) and the brightest (4) shades merge with white (5) and black (0) because the shades themselves are rounded up or down to the closest output available. A system with a high bit depth LUT does not need to round shades to the closest output value that can use additional intermediate values. Because of this increased precision, posterization of image and color banding are not a problem for even the oldest and most color-changed displays.

Most currently available monitors have 8-bit LUT, though 6-bit and higher 10-bit LUT’s are also on the market. For most purposes, 8-bit options deliver quality calibrations and clearer, color-true pictures. There are also monitors, usually LCD and marketed specifically to gamers, that sacrifice bit depth LUT for higher refresh rates. This process is the quick change of animated graphics in that many games with more quality and smoothness, but is no importance for those interested in viewing photos and still graphics.

Standard Gamut or Wide Gamut (Extended Gamut)?

RGBAll physical devices have restrictions when it comes to the types of colors that it can provide. An inkjet printer does not have the ability to produce a better shade of yellow than what is provided by the ink cartridge. The shade of red that your monitor shows is restricted by the hardware that is utilized in the LCD panel. This is known as the device’s color gamut.

A majority of monitors have a color gamut that matches the SRGB color gamut. You might already know that the sRGB color gamut does not have as much as the more commonly utilized Adobe 1998 version. Also, a lot of the Adobe colors that can be printed via your inkjet printer are actually not in the range of the SRGB colors. As a result, your camera can provide these colors and they can be printed with your printer. However, you cannot see them on your monitor. Basically, you will view an estimate of these colors because they are restricted by the monitor’s color gamut.

Wide gamut monitors get rid of this issue because what they have is matched up with a bigger amount of what the Adobe 1998 has. You can find this amount in the monitor’s specs. The benefit of this is that you can view colors in your pictures that look brighter than the regular gamut monitor. This gives you the ability to see all of the colors in your pictures.

It is best to have a wide gamut display because this is the way of the future. This is practically what is available right now. To utilize this type of display, you have to know about color managed workflows and possess a display that has the right calibration. You also have to utilize a color managed app such as Photoshop. This is not that hard to manage, but you have to know exactly what you are doing in order to be successful with it.

How to choose:

Depending on your photo and graphic display and editing needs, you need to choose a monitor that covers the sRGB spectrum and possibly the Adobe RPG spectrum as well. The first specification is found on every single quality monitor on the market today.

The sRGB spectrum is more than sufficient for web-based photographs and all graphics that are intended to be displayed on a monitor in their final form. For artists that print their work, the Adobe RPG spectrum capable monitor will result in better clarity, color correctness and ultimately higher-quality work.

Currently, nearly all monitor can cover more than 99% of the sRGB spectrum however not all of them can cover most of the Adobe RGB spectrum.

LED Monitors

You are entering the market monitor LCD backlit LED. in this case too there are different types, corresponding to different acronyms.

For photographic use, ask attention to buy a monitor RGB LED and not el-wled . The second option does not provide a color reproduction sufficiently faithful.

Viewing Angle

The first LCD monitor for your computer suffered from an angle of view very reduced. What does that mean?

With a reduced visual angle, moving left to right, top or bottom with respect to the central axis of the monitor, the colors are transformed and the contrast changes . You can imagine how it is absolutely recommended in a monitor to use for photo retouching.

The monitor of more recent production, allow you to move to the right or to the left relative to the monitor without noting obvious changes in the image. Choose a monitor with at least 120° of visual angle horizontal and possibly the same for the vertical.

Resolution

On this aspect there is little to say, the available resolutions are not a lot, especially, the resolution is also determined by the size of the diagonal.

For a monitor by 23 or 24 inches, the size that I advised before, do not fall under a native resolution of 1920 * 1200. Recalls that LCD monitors should be always used to their resolution, so don’t think you can use a resolution higher or lower than the one specified.

Should You Buy a 4K monitor?

Any full-size image on a 4K monitor will be displayed with enough detail and beauty for a photographer’s appreciation. Your palettes tools can also be set to an incredible number.

These pictures also require the ability to zoom in and out in a photo editing program like Photoshop and also to display text and fonts clearly and at the correct size. This differs from standard video, television or gaming monitor usage.

Most computer software applications are designed to make use of full high definition resolutions, which results in text that is easily viewed from a standard distance away. In 4K format, text minimizes to an uncomfortable level in the same programs and software apps.

4K is becoming highly active in the 2016 market but this display technology is outpacing some of the older programs that people still use every day. If you combine software usage from even two or three years ago with the new 4K option, the size of your text will be unreadable. This makes for very difficult computing and a lot of frustration between modern technology usage and keeping older but not yet obsolete software.

In order to get the best benefit from 4K, you need to make sure that the programs you use work well with it. Many of the standard Windows applications work well with 4K already although some Windows desktop ecosystems may lag behind this technology.

By far the most popular graphics and photography editing software, Adobe Photoshop, is already working well with 4K displays. Even the largest pictures can be viewed with full detail at high resolutions and in actual size without the need to zoom in or out or scroll the workspace. The entire Photoshop interface scales easily so you have no problem accessing all your favorite tools and palettes. If you are regularly engaged in photography or graphics editing or work with videos, a 4K monitor is virtually essential.

To conclude, my personal opinion is that the 4K display capabilities are very attractive but not quite yet practical for all uses. In your excitements about this new technology, it is still important to hang back a bit and make sure all your existing hardware and the programs you use regularly work with the 4K monitor before you purchase one.

Digital connection

Now all of the monitors should be equipped with a digital connection, HDMI or DVI. Be careful not to buy a fund of magazine that has only the VGA.

Also, check which ports are available on your computer. Don’t worry, however: adapters exist able to convert any format.

Our recommendation:

Eizo ColorEdge CG277 (High end choice, 10-bit color +16 bit LUT, 99% Adobe RGB)

Eizo ColorEdge CG277

EIZO’s crown jewel, the ColorEdge CG277 monitor, is aimed at professionals in the video editing, digital photography, prepress, and post production fields. And honestly, it’s the perfect screen for them, with its 27-inch wide CG277 display any professional would appreciate, housing a self-calibrating sensor that shifts up to store neatly into its frame. The CG277’s internal correction sensor utilizes an external sensor to store and maintain calibration results. It can pack a punch with all of its bells and whistles: a 2560×1440 pixel resolution, a 10-bit display complete with 16-bit look-up table, a wide-gamut IPS panel capable of reproducing 99% of the Adobe RGB colour space, DVI-D input terminals, LED backlight, a DisplayPort, and HDMI capacity. But, if you can believe it, that’s not all it comes with! The Eizo ColorEdge CG277 also has tone characteristics that activate a mere seven minutes post-powerup, stable brightness chromaticity, an elegant ergonomic stand, and, to top it all off, a monitor hood capable of switching between portrait mode and landscape.

It is singularly considered to be the best choice for imaging professionals that work with video or still production. Why?

Well, this is mainly due to the CG277’s phenomenal colour accuracy. Despite having just raved about how amazing it is, we do need to stress that its lack of 4K resolution does somewhat decrease how appealing it is as a screen, in comparison to other 4K models out on the market. And yet, it is this small flaw, interestingly enough, other 4K models helps keep the cost of this outstanding monitor low. What does this all mean for professional users? Plainly put, it means that it’s an excellent time to purchase it at such an affordable price.

Ideally, all that CG277 performance and power would come in a much more eye-catching frame. But, that bulky screen is really no big deal when you add up all the pros about this model. Honestly, this 27incher has the same footprint as its same-sized competitors, all thanks to its unobtrusive, yet highly efficient, monitor stand.

The Eizo CG277’s built-in calibration sensor may be considered a tad on the useless side for professionals or companies that prefer a uniform sensor for their displays. But, undoubtedly, there are countless businesses or individual professionals out there that have only one quality screen to rely on, and in turn, will invariably believe this built-in sensor is very convenient.

If you’re in need of a solid, dependable display for your professional grade work, then there are no hard cons, only pros, with the CG277. Enthusiasts will note that there are other screens out there that would provide an equally excellent performance for a fraction of the price.

Our Opinion

You’ll be hard-pressed to find a better display for colour accuracy than the Eizo ColorEdge CG277, although others may not have that 4K resolution if that’s what you’re looking for. However, if you’re a professional that doesn’t depend primarily on display resolution, the CG277 is an attractive option.

>>Read More information and user reviews on B&H Photo<<

ASUS PA329Q – High end choice, 4K, 10 bit, 99.5% Adobe RGB, 32 inch

ASUS PA329Q

Check out the ASUS PA329Q ultra-wide monitor if you’re shopping for a top quality professional grade screen since the high pixel density is an absolute ‘must have’ feature. That’s why we’re looking at Asus’ sleek PA329Q model right now with its ever popular 32-inch Ultra HD resolution IPS panel.

Professionals need a truly reliable monitor that can withstand whatever tough project their job requires them to do. So, with that in mind, it’s clear to see that the Asus’ ProArt series provides users exactly what they need with its wide range of factory-calibrated color choices. We had previously assessed the PA328Q model which boasted everything a professional would require for their color-critical applications, with the exception of a wide-gamut option. However, here we look into the PA329Q features 32-inch IPS panel and Ultra HD resolution capabilities, including the ever-so-useful addition of Adobe RGB.

Above all else, the PA329Q is, without a doubt, an excellent price. In comparison to other similar 32-inch Ultra HD monitors, the Asus PA329Q, with its sleek style and consistent screen output, simply gives you much more value-wise. And, even though it is one of the few monitors classified in its range, it stands out for its resolution and wide-gamut option.

In all honestly, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a poor quality product amongst truly professional monitors. Although not all screens are created equally, once you do start to assess factory-certified calibration PC monitors you’re, essentially, guaranteed a certain level of quality. And, without exception, the PA329Q upholds that standard of accuracy. The Asus PA329Q is, therefore, a smart choice for users seeking professional-grade level models.

We like the PA329Q and its many capabilities and would certainly recommend it to those on the lookout for a less expensive alternative to higher-end (and higher price range) screens. Although we’d appreciate seeing more extensive color meter support and more of the OSD’s features available with extra picture modes, we do appreciate its fixed RGB and Adobe RGB mode reliability. Asus adds on even more value by including user-friendly calibration software. Aside from those points, this model would make a sturdy, dependable addition to any professional’s office.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

LG 31MU97 Great Choice for Video Editing 4096×2160, (True 4K), 99.5% Adobe RGB, 31 inch

LG 31MU97

Prepare to be amazed at the LG 31MU97-B’s resolution, which is an impressive 4096 x 2160p, and is specifically targeted towards a more professional crowd. This LG native 4K resolution display will most certainly delight photographers, graphic designers, and video editors alike with its professional-grade capabilities. We believe video editors will be particularly pleased because of the LG 31MU97-B monitor’s relative ease of use, and remarkably hassle-free, video post-production abilities with minimal to nil levels of distortion.

Users can smoothly multitask between different programs, all without having to switch back and forth between windows, on this 17:9 aspect ratio widescreen, which can prove to be a real timesaver. Consequently, users can take advantage of this feature to compare and contrast graphics and pictures and observe any colour variances without the hassle of going back-and-forth between windows.

LG 31MU97-B’s IPS display supports 99.5% Adobe RGB. Its wide colour gamut (and colour temperature) reduces any colour difference and loss which, incidentally, covers both color ranges or CMYK and sRGB. This means users can effortlessly retouch their images and photos. The end result is unbelievably vivid and vibrant colours on your final product which other panels (like the VA) simply cannot provide.

After having mentioned all this, do keep in mind that, when you push this monitor to its optimum resolution of 4096×2160p at 50 Hz, it does become a bit shaky. Unfortunately, the LG 31MU97-B screen does not support a 60Hz Refresh Rate. So, that means any animated transitions, sliding through windows, or even so much as scrolling up and down webpages can seem to be a bit jerky. Although it’s a noticeable issue, we can’t say it’s overtly distracting, particularly if you’re used to screens that run at 60Hz. Luckily, you can avoid all this by turning it down to 3840×2160 which allows you to run at 60Hz. Users will still need to deal with a bit of letterboxing once they select this option, but it’s a small price to pay to avoid frame rate reduction.

For those professionals in need of a high-tech, top-level PC monitor, loaded with the latest technology to date, then the multi-functional and fully loaded LG 31MU97-B is the answer. Ideal for videographers, photographers, graphic designers, or basically anyone who deals with content creation requiring consistent, accurate, and clear colour. Having said this, a monitor of this caliber is, in fact, best suited for people that need 10-bit colour/Adobe RGB colour gamut or Cinema 4K resolution.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

BenQ SW2700PT – Mid-end Choice, 99% ADOBE RGB, 2560×1440, 14 bit

BenQ SW2700PT

Are you a professional on the hunt for a top quality monitor known for its unique colour capacity and intense display palette? You’ll need to look no further than the BenQ 27-inch SW2700PT. Professionals prefer this model because of its detailed QHD screen resolution which is considered to be the best in its class.

With its 100% AdobeRGB capabilities, the technologically advanced BenQ SW2700PT screen stands out clearly from other monitors. Its sharp images and crisp definition demonstrate a superior colour saturation with an excellent vivid contrast. Despite its accuracy to display images, the BenQ SW2700PT’s screen consistency cannot quite compete with more expensive, higher grade models. However, considering the surprisingly affordable $600 price tag on this monitor, it is undoubtedly a fantastic value considering its technological capabilities. In fact, you’d need to spend upwards of $1200 for better screen consistency, which makes the BenQ SW2700PT a real steal at that price.

With a clear 2,560-by-1,440-resolution screen, the SW2700PT monitor boasts an impressive 27-inch WQHD matte panel which is all based on advanced AHVA technology. It’s easy to see how similar to In-Plane Switching (IPS) technology it is, considering its wide viewing angles and stunning color intensity. This monitor allows for hardware calibration allowing the user to access screen processing circuitry to adjust color settings for preference, instead of altering GPU output. Additionally, the SW2700PT monitor uses a 14-bit Look-Up Table (LUT) which controls color management and ensures precise, smooth color gradation. Users will need to acquire their own colorimeter, but, by downloading BenQ’s free proprietary Palette Master Element calibration software, they can save any selected settings as a preset and easily calibrate their monitor.

This screen is remarkably well designed with excellent additional features such as a built-in USB3 hub with SD card reader and the handy remote control that allows for quick, seamless setting changes. The SW2700PT monitor and shading hood is ergonomically designed and includes such useful features as the multi-adjustable screen stand that is capable of pivoting positions from landscape to portrait. Colour-wise, although its colour performance is rated as solid and reliable, the SW2700PT’s black and white display values and accuracies are considered to be superb. This monitor will most assuredly please professional photographers, graphic artists, and designers since it covers 100% of Adobe RGB. Personally, I would prefer a newer HDMI 2.0 port as opposed to the outdated HDMI 1.4 port this screen offers, but that’s a pretty trivial issue considering it by no means prevents us from giving our Editors’ Choice award to the BenQ SW2700PT for the midrange, big-screen monitor category.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Dell P2715Q and P2415Q – 4K monitor, 79% AdobeRGB, 27 or 23.8 inch

Dell P2715Q

Are you looking for a monitor that can deliver a particularly excellent image quality? Then the factory-calibrated P2715Q will ensure pristine color quality reproduction from day one and guarantee any user with near-real-life imagery. Initial screen tests showed that it could, in fact, cover 79% of the AdobeRGB spectrum and 100% of the sRGB spectrum. We were impressed! Moreover, the contrast ratio is remarkable reaching 690:1 when at maximum brightness.

According to industry photographers, the DELL P2715Q surpasses expectations with its superb colour and picture quality, as well as colour production, thanks to its 4K resolution and IPS panel. Keep in mind that only a select few other monitors nowadays offer wider colour gamuts. Also, most inexpensive 4K screens can only manage about 70 to 75% of the AdobeRGB spectrum. All this means that the P2715Q is, without a doubt, ahead of its time. Nevertheless, you definitely want to purchase a display that is closer to 100% Adobe RGB if you’ll need to do any Illustrator, Lightroom, or Photoshop work, thus requiring higher quality, or magazine-ready, printing. Moreover, the contrast ratio on this UHD PC monitor is considered to be truly one of the best on the market to date.

Unquestioningly, the Dell P2715Q is an advanced 4K monitor in comparison to other similar range models out there. It was one of the first monitors to offer exceptional image quality at an affordable price, all while supplying the user with a durable frame, an ergonomic stand, and fully functional 3840 x 2160 pixels of full UHD visual connectivity. If you don’t have a lot of space in your office set-up, or if you perhaps wish to save a bit money-wise, then the Dell P2415Q would be a great selection for you due to its smaller size. Truth be told, this monitor’s factory-calibrated picture is minimally less accurate than our preferred screen choice, but in the end, the difference is trivial. When it comes down to it, this 24-inch screen has many similarities as the larger P2715Q: the same display connections and IPS panel type, the same display resolution (3840×2160), audio connection and USB 3.0 hub (minus one port), and the same VESA support and physical adjustability.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Philips 276E6ADSS – Affordable wide gamut Monitor, Price under 300$

Philips 276E6ADSS

First off, we’d like to emphasize how truly interesting and unique the Philips 276E6 because of its wide colour gamut which is void of unnecessarily costly or complex backlight arrangement. The key is the screen’s IPS-ADS and Quantum Dots combo. With it, the monitor is capable of producing an exceptionally fine, bright image with outstanding color saturation, some great viewing angles, pretty decent contrast, and lots of light output. Want to know a little perk? It does all of this with ultra-low power consumption. A fantastic quality considering its lower price category within the range of rank-and-file professional screens.

However, there are a few drawbacks when compared to elite range screens, like the Dell UP2716D, that have wide gamut capabilities. Prominent issues include the lack of emulation modes in order to cut down on native colour gamut as well as the use of PWM for regulating backlight. Keeping these shortcomings in mind, we would not recommend the Philips 276E6ADSS for any color-critical work. Yet, it will surely satisfy all other users with its lovely image quality.

There are a few more points not in its favor that we feel we should mention, namely, its lower resolution, surprising lack of ports, the absence of overall ergonomic flexibility, and VESA mounting. Also, this screen only comes in white. Now, that’s not necessarily a drawback, but, some users will go for it, while others will simply be put-off. It’s not a perfect monitor by any means, but it’s a nice option for users that have a limited budget to work with and will appreciate a monitor that offers an Adobe RGB colour gamut.

Many professionals like the option to have color saturation beyond what typical video standards require. Standard HDTV picture modes, for instance, will have options like Vivid and Brilliant which increase gamut to enhance screen image. It’s not just for showroom purposes; plenty of people gladly use them daily. The Philips 276E6 is perfect for users who prefer this approach as it offers a wide gamut with loads of brightness and high clarity at an affordable price. The Philips white frame and elegant modern styling will certainly stand out amidst a sea of industrial black monitors.

That $300 price tag is sure hard to beat, but of course, it all depends on your preferences and priorities. If wide gamut, sharp colors and quantum dots are an absolute requirement for you, then the Philips 276E6, costing less than $300, is one of the few ways you can bring those things home.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

74 Comments - Leave a comment
  1. Stephanie says:

    Hi all,
    I’m hoping someone can lend some insight on the following. I should start by admitting I know exactly nothing about technology but my husband is really into photo- and video-editing and has started to pursue it more seriously in the recent months. I want to get him a new monitor that will allow him to do this work (he isn’t a gamer so there’s no need to factor in considerations for that). This site has been a HUGE help. After looking at Dell’s line up of offerings, however, I hoping someone can tell me which of the following is the better option: the Dell P2715Q (so favourably reviewed here) or the U2718Q which, to my very basic understanding, seems like a very similar, newer model..? Any and all advice very much appreciated!!

  2. Jeff says:

    I was looking at getting the LG 31MU97, but now the new LG 32UD99 that was at CES this year is available for pre-order at B&H. Would anyone recommend one way or the other which one you’d prefer? I like the 31MU97 since it covers AdobeRGB, but the 32UD99 covers DCI-P3 which is almost the same area. So again, just wondering what you all thought about one versus the other.

    Thanks!

  3. Andre B says:

    Very informative article, thank you. I found this BenQ BL2420U UHD Designer monitor.
    Has anyone used it and if yes, what are your thoughts about it?
    Thanks

  4. nilesh says:

    thanks very useful details

  5. Dan says:

    Hi, I’m new in photo editing. I’m looking to upgrade my monitor and came across a ViewSonic model VP2468, has anyone tried this model for photo editing, apparently the price is quite reasonable and it claims to have 100%sRGB color gamut with Delta E less than 2.

    • JD says:

      Hi Dan, I too have been looking at the Viewsonic VP2468. I have 4 Viewsonics and they have all been great, but I have to replace my graphics cards because the fans are finished, it is now hard to get GP with 2 DVI so I have to get another monitor that has HDMI. As I am now getting into printing photos I thought that now is the time to get at least one decent monitor for the photos. Can I ask did you buy this one, if so what are your thoughts.

  6. JC says:

    Hi, thank you SO much for this article!!! I recently bought a new macbook pro and I was going to buy an Apple monitor as well when I was told at the store that they don’t carry monitors anymore. They do sell, however, LG monitors that have a cable with the their new standard ports, but I wasn’t sure if that monitor with that price was what I needed as a photographer. Thankfully I ran into this post and ended up buying the Dell P2415Q. I’m really happy!

  7. Paolo says:

    Still not sure what to get… I’m opening my site to sell photo prints, photo books. Until now the best monitor I’ve owned is the Dell U2715H. I’m opening my studio, and I’m not sure to get the same model or go with a 4k. I’ll do also a little bit of gaming (nothing enthusiast).
    Does the Dell P2715Q is worth the price (I’m also considering the benq you list in the sub500 price range) or I must go with another U2715H?

  8. Gerard Keyes says:

    Thank you for sharing all of this general and technical information. I wasn’t sure where to start in selecting a monitor for photo editing and printing photos. Your experience and above information in this field is greatly appreciated. Thank you.

  9. Alok JR says:

    thanks for the detail information and suggestions. I used this as a base for all my thanksgiving research and purchase. I bought Dell P2415Q from Amazon for $ 350.00

  10. Aga says:

    Grand work, Author! Big thank you for sharing your findings here.

  11. sahil says:

    please suggest 24 inch dell model for video & photo editing in budget price, having matte screen & full hd display, price between 200$ to 270$

  12. YVES says:

    WOOOOH THIS INFO IS ABSOLUTE GOLD , HOURS AND HOURS , REALLY THANK YOU SO MUCH

    OUTSTANDING WORK , AND GIVING IT AWAY IN A WORLD WHICH CHARGES FOR EVEN AIR

    WISH YOU ALL THE BEST
    KIND REGARDS

  13. Retha Van Straaten says:

    Good Day
    I am starting with Photographyand i have a Mecer 23.6 Wide LED monitor. I am not sure if it will be okay to use to do editing on? Any advice will be welcome.
    Thank you

  14. Roshini says:

    Sorry meant to say a BIG THANK YOU for the
    extensive research and info provided.
    I learnt a great deal. However now in a quandary as to what I should purchase on a limited budget of Zar 2000 max or less.
    Help

  15. Roshini says:

    Hi!I am have just started with my photography
    business. Currently not in a position to spend a great deal on a monitor.
    I have a Dell N5010 NOTEBOOK , I5.
    I need a compatible Dell monitor which costs around ZAR 2000 max or less.
    I found second hand Dell
    S2440l for ZAR1500.
    THE reason I am holding back on purchasing is due to the glossy screen instead of Matt.
    Please help.

  16. Thomas says:

    Hi, many thanks for this impressive review. It really helps during the selection process .. The two high-end BenQ models are rather similar and I’m hesitant, any comparative advices ?
    BenQ SW2700PT or BenQ BL2711U ?
    Thank –

  17. James Swick says:

    Thanks with much appreciation. You saved me a ton of time and gave me the assurance I purchased the best product for my needs.

  18. Klark Kent says:

    Hi, It is very informative and I’d like to thank you. In my country prices’ of 27″ dell u2713h and asus pa 249q are very close. I am a new born photographer and I am gonna buy new monitor. Unfortunately asus pa279q is out of my range and there is no satisfactory comparison between them. I need user reviews especially who has experiences with both. Think that you are in my shoes, what you are going to buy? u2713h or asus pa 249q?

    • Klark Kent says:

      Updated Question:
      It seems Dell does not continue to manufacture 2713H. New substitute of it is UP2716D. Now Asus PA249Q or Dell UP2716D?

  19. Lane says:

    The Asus PA249Q is listed in the comparison chart as a 27″ monitor when in fact it is a 24″ monitor. I’m so disappointed. The Asus sounds like a real monitor for the money but I wanted a 27″ monitor at 1920X1200. Just.an FYI.

  20. Donald Fisher says:

    I see comments far back to January of 2014. Have these details been updated to reflect 2016 information? Thanks for the work!

    • admin says:

      Yes, we update the information every month, I’m glade to hear you like my article.

  21. Dimi says:

    Thanks for the great info!
    What about bigger screens ? 40+ inches
    I’m using my TV in the living room for my desktop display and want to change it with a pro level photo editing screen but also want to watch TV on it using my HDMI connected sky box. Are there any good options on the market regardless of the price?

  22. Chris says:

    You’re write up includes reference to glossy screens, however your list of recommended monitors only shows matte screens, why is this. Are there any 4K glossy screen monitors you can recommend similar to iMac retina which My son has and is excellent, way better for photos than my matte screen.

  23. habbaz says:

    Thanks.
    what about the “HP Pavilion 23xw” is it good for Graphic editing? and how much sRGB have?

  24. Roz Brownlie says:

    That is fantastic information. Is there any advice regarding a good laptop? My current one has THE worst colour calibration and I would like to invest in a new one that gives me much better colour and clarity. I’d love to own a Mac, but not possible as the laptop will be connected to business computers that are PCs.

    • Austin says:

      You can run Windows side-by-side with MacOS.

      • Austin says:

        Also, note that according to tests performed by laptopmag, the new 12″ macbook has the best color gamut and delta-E, followed closely by Pro 13 and then Pro 15, with both Air models trailing significantly.

  25. Tim Christokat says:

    Great arricle. How do rate the LG 31MU97Z-B 78,74cm 31″ for video and photography work?

    • Tim Christokat says:

      Great article. How do you rate the LG 31MU97Z-B 78, 31″ for video and photography work?

  26. amanda says:

    Excellent, thank you! Saved me so much time.

    I like to support bloggers who provide great info, unfortunately though this time, I wasn’t able to purchase via your links because I needed international shipping & the Amazon suppliers of the models I wanted didn’t ship…. so I clicked your ads! ha ha. Thanks.

  27. Tejas says:

    Thnx for an informative article
    I’m begginer in this photo editing field
    plz guide me for a monitor & my budget is not more than $100 to $130

  28. John says:

    Hi,
    Thank’s for a very interesting and informative article. How would you rate the Acer CB240HYK for photo and video editing.

    Thanks,
    John.

  29. Sivaraj says:

    HI..

    Thank you so much for making a very useful content for those who is at the beginning stage..

    Siva

  30. Vicki says:

    I disagree about big screens. Hate them! Same about big TVs. 21″ is fine for me.

  31. K Watson says:

    Hi, thank you for your very detailed analysis. I have a particular that I hope you can help me with. I have dabbled in Photography for years but am planning to go professional very soon.

    My problem: I am disabled with MS and spinal issues that both force me to do my photo editing in bed on a laptop. I have done a monitor calibration but still have issues, of course, with contrast and prints looking overly edited at times.

    Are there ANY laptop monitors that would work better than others? What laptop monitor specs should I look for.

    Thank you very much again for all of the great info that you provide.

  32. Pantelis Mor says:

    Hello from Greece,

    Nice job. I learn a lot from your article. I want to buy a monitor for photo edit.

    I saw these monitors
    Dell UltraSharp U2715H for 550 euro
    BenQ GW2765HT for 450 euro
    Asus PB278QR for 490 euro

    I think for Benq. It’s the cheapest. What are the difference between these models ? is it worth to pay about 100 euro more for the dell ??

    Thx

  33. Lorena Cerisano says:

    Your information is very informative.
    I’m almost ready to purchase monitor but need clarification on a few things per your review.
    I’ve narrowed my decision to 3 monitors. Need your input please.
    1) You have ViewSonic 23 inch but don’t mention the ViewSonic VP2770-LED 27-Inch. Any reason why this 27″ is not listed?
    2) Would you consider this ViewSonic VP2770-LED 27-Inch a better monitor for photo editing compared to the BenQ GW2765HT? pros and cons.
    3) Also, what are pros and cons for these 2: BenQ GW2765HT or BenQ BL3200PT
    Thank you!

  34. DPC says:

    The Samsung S32D850T is awesome, though to avoid contrast shift problems the monitor needs to be 36 to 40 inches away from the eye. Have it closer and contrast shift will start to cause blooming and even minor hue shift. At 3~3.5 feet away the colors are visibly identical to the Dell U2713HM next to it.

    If you can tolerate being three to 3.5 feet away from the monitor, the added contrast is a real boon; the Dell pales by comparison (pun not intended). Though with the Dell, one can be 2 feet away or closer.

  35. MANOJ NAYAK says:

    Shop No. 201, II Flor All Hatami Complex Shoping Center

  36. Norbert Drage says:

    Well-written article in terms of content, but I’m a little surprised that neither Eizo’s nor NEC’s professional offerings made it into your shortlist.

    The features like colour space, colour calibration, build quality, accessories (hoods, calibration spiders, etc.) as well as connectors (most will use DisplayPort as standard) are geared towards professionals and the only real thing holding these back from even more wide-spread adoption is the price..

  37. Rishab says:

    Hello, thanks for the wonderful article. I’m an amateur photographer and looking for a job in the field of management. As a hobby am doing photography and I hope one day I’ll be able to make some money from it. I have a normal laptop on which I work on my photos using photoshop and camera raw. I’m looking for an HD screen in low budget, so I would request you to kindly suggest me a screen (or 2) which are good for me at this stage. I would go by your suggestion for the size and brand, but it must be good and cheap too. My preferred budget is US$100 but I can go up by not more than $150. I believe I can get a good screen in this budget. If you talk about my interest, I was looking for an IPS HD screen and one of my friends recommended me Dell 2240L IPS monitor. Please suggest me a good IPS HD LED screen for my post processing work. I would be grateful to you. You can email me or post your reply here. FYI, I use Nikon D3200 and I have a 50mm prime lens, Tamron 18-200mm lens and a tripod. I’m also looking forward to a Wide angle lens (Tokina 11mm).
    Thanks.

    • DPC says:

      For IPS, go for the Dell U2713HM. Compared to the U3014 (also AH-IPS) the U2713HM has slightly better contrast, better response time, and is 50% less in price. These two models have had some users complaining of image retention. But both exceed your $150 limit.

      The Dell S2440L? I used one. It’s great. And is about $200 (less by now). It’s an AMVA panel, probably, but the 24″ screen size negates a lot of issues with 32″ AMVA panels that have to sit farther back before contrast or hue shift are noticed.

  38. Alex says:

    Thanks a ton for a super informative article!! I was wondering if a lot of these same properties, requirements, or tips would apply to video editing as well. I work with photography often but video even more. A lot of the models you have described here have shown up in my research as well (I’m in the $200-$500 range). Do you know anything about video editing monitors, or if any one model here has features that would help it perform best that you would recommend? Thanks, Alex.

    • Clay says:

      They’re pretty much the same with photo and video editing, it’s the color and pixels that matter. I use the Dell P2415Q 4k for editing video. Remember that video is just moving pictures so many of the same principles apply.

  39. Jose A. says:

    Very valuable information as I go from a vague understanding to a working knowledge on how to select a monitor that suits my photo editing needs. Thank you!

  40. JJ says:

    hello, sorry I’m having a hard time understanding the English in this article. The sentences are not very easy to understand. Just some friendly advice! Maybe needs a little editing.

  41. Hi from Greece! Very good article!
    I am professional photographer and i currently work with an 2010 iMac 27”. I want to change screen and go for a matte finish. Do you think that Samsung WQHD S32D850T has better color accuracy from my iMac monitor? Consider that i am calibration with external hardware calibrator every 2 months and my work is studio advertising photography.
    Thank you.

    • DPC says:

      Your iMac, depending on year of manufacture, typically uses the same AH-IPS that the Dell equivalent to the time uses.

      About the Samsung – the S32D850T is great once calibrated, and IF you keep it three feet or more away from you as contrast shift (and even hue shift) can occur if placed too closely to you (e.g. 24″ has obvious contrast shift issues and even slight hue shift.)

      Keep it 36+” away and you will not see any visible difference in hue to an AH-IPS panel. You will see deeper black and more lush imagery, which is a sight to behold. Especially at night, or when taking DSLR snapshots to illustrate the differences, 3000:1 vs 1000:1 shows a very respectable difference.

      The only other issue with that Samsung, as with all other 32″ models using AMVA panels, is that there is a vertical banding problem in many units due to a manufacturing issue. A third in from each side, a band can be seen under certain circumstances and might show up while playing games. I’ve seen such banding on cheaper 40″ TVs as well. Size seems to be an issue with the chance of greater issues such as this. The larger the screen tends to increase the chances of visible banding. Even my Dell U2713HM here has banding, but one really has to look hard to find it.

      The Samsung S32D850T definitely deserves to be on the list of best monitor for photo editing.

  42. Roger Brookstein says:

    Most interesting and helpful review, thank you. Desk space is limited so which of your recommendations can be wall mounted please?

  43. Robbo says:

    U2713HM is not a wide gamut display, but the U2713H is.

  44. Colleen says:

    What about the HP Pavilion 27xi 27-Inch IPS LED Backlit Monitor
    CDN$ 337.21 Is it better than the BenQ GW Series GW2760HS 27-Inch Screen LED-Lit Monitor

  45. Craig Burrows says:

    Thank you for a very good review. After spending a long time researching it is this page that was most informative. Now I just hope I made the right purchase.

  46. Adeline says:

    Hi, Thanks so much for this article.
    Dell released new 4K monitor P2415Q, I cant find difference between this one and Dell UP2414Q other then the price.
    I would use it for photography, editing. It is an investment for me but I dont want to waste money on the same result, which one would you vote for?

    • Jane says:

      The UP2414Q has Premier Color; essentially it’s targeted at professional photographers and others that need what’s called a wide Gamut to their color sensitive work, or at least an increased accuracy to the available color gamut range.
      If your not going to be doing important work on the monitor that relies on very accurate color reproduction, go ahead and pick up the cheaper P2415Q without worrying much about it – it will still be a pretty amazing monitor.

    • I’m just returning a Dell 4K UP2414Q, because it CONTINUALLY stays in sleep mode, after only 3 days of trying to get it set up. The reviews I’ve read in Dell’s website are full of this same comment. My 2nd. choice is ASUS 4K PB287Q…but it has a TN panel instead of the IPS that I need for photography and graphics work. I don’t know what to do. I’d try a Dell replacement of the same but with so many like reviews, I hate to take the chance. Ideas?

      • Adeline says:

        I know, I read the reviews and they all say the same. They didnt release an update of the software that does that..
        I really need an accurate color, and the performance.. but anything comparable costs a lot more. And this one is not working perfectly either.. same problem..

  47. Andreas says:

    Hello

    Appreciate the article.

    Which Dell monitor is better for Photoshop editing: U2713HM or UZ2715H?

    thank you

  48. Shelly says:

    What is your opinion about using a Samsung 32″ 5203 LED TV for editing?

  49. Tobias says:

    Very well done article,it really covered everything I needed to know. I’ve looked around and bought the Dell UP2414Q from your advice since I am limited to 24″ due to space on my desk and it seemed like the best one. Thanks for writing this!

  50. gat says:

    are you sure it’s an ASUS VG248QE not an ASUS PA248QJ? VG is a TN panel, while PA is the IPS panel?

  51. Refit says:

    Thanks, this is useful. However I don’t understand how Dell 2412M is in your list of best buys. It goes against all your parameters – it is 6 bit, uses WLED, and covers only 71% of NTSC colours.

  52. Nuno Oliveira says:

    I really apreciate all these information, acording to your recomendation would you buy the Dell UltraSharp U2412M ? it is not to big, is a 16:10 ratio, 100% srgb coverage and 99% adobe rgb. my only doupt is if the 1000:1/300 Nits are enough.
    I hope you can anwer 🙂

  53. Depewmad says:

    Great article Major help in making it easier to find a good monitor
    Thanks!!

  54. Akshay says:

    Hi,
    I really appreciate this write up. It is very detailed and informative. Very good comparison of different markets that are currently available in market. Thanks for making photographer’s lives easier.

    I will appreciate if you can comment on a monitor I am looking at I loved the features.
    Asus PA279Q 27″

  55. Alain Desgroseilliers says:

    This very interesting article will help me to find the best monitor for my photography viewing

  56. Barry says:

    I am very pleased I can across this article.

  57. miguel Vasq says:

    thank you for such a good article. The technical info is very valuable and make photographers to make better choices.

  58. Jay says:

    Hi, I would like to thank you for such an informative write up. It was exactly what I was looking for. Well done!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*