• August 12, 2017

Best Monitor for macbook Pro and Mac Mini/Air 2017

Because of the Apple PC’s excellent screen, the presentation of color gradation, hue, and contrast is much better than that of traditional PC computers. Thus it is the main choice for many professional video and photograph editors. In particular, the recent launch of the Apple MacBook Pro and MacBook Mini with retina screens further established that Apple has the professional user in mind. The only drawback is that MacBook Pro’s 13 or 15.4-inch screen is too small. In fact the MacBook Air only has an 11.6-inch screen. If you usually use your Mac only to browse the web, screen size it is not so important. But for those who run complex software (such as Xcode or Photoshop), the MacBook’s screen cannot cope with all the windows. Users will need to keep pressing Option-Tab to switch between windows. An external monitor does allow you to have more display space, and helps you get the job done more efficiently.

macbook Pro

It is worth mentioning that not only does an external monitor offer a larger display space, but there is also some software optimized for multi-display software (such as Aperture and iMovie) that offers more convenience. For example, if you use iMovie to edit video on a single display, the movie preview windows will be pushed to the upper-right corner of the screen by other windows. If you have two monitors, you can use one screen exclusively for the movie preview and put the other windows on the second monitor.

(more…)

last comments ...
Nancy Nafziger
Nancy Nafziger

Thanks for the info. It's the best info I could find on the web! I have a…
Jill
Jill

What is the best 27 " monitor for photo editing I have a Mac Book Pro 10.6
Denise
Denise

Hi I have a macbook pro 13 inch with retina but want a larger screen for desk about 23 no…
Cheryl Martens
Cheryl Martens

Thank-you for the review. I have a few questions concerning monitor quality. I have a macbook pro 13" and I…
Haaspeni
Haaspeni

Thank you for very good review. I have two question. Is BenQ SW 2700PT a good choise for both Mac…

  • August 2, 2017

Best Monitor for Photo Editing and Video Editing (August 2017)

If you are a digital photographer, you will need a computer and a monitor to see your photos in order to evaluate or retouch them. And if you want a job well done, as often happens in photography, you can’t use just any monitor, you have to choose with care.

Monitor for Photo Editing

This may mean knowing how to decipher mysterious new acronyms and compare technical characteristics that seem to be made to be understood only by an engineer.

Of course you can find monitors that are extremely costly, designed for professionals with deeper pockets. But luckily there are affordable alternatives that are, in any case, a leap in quality when compared to the monitor based on a laptop or a desktop computer.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing recommendation:

Monitors that incorporate all the features that I listed about on prices between 100$ to 2000$.

With a little patience, however, you can find offers that will make saving a few dozen dollars. As I wrote before, if your budget is tight, of the features that I have described can find a compromise on size, but not on the other.

Disclaimer: Clicking on a “Details on Amazon” link will bring to you to the appropriate Amazon.com product listing, where you can check the price, customer reviews and more information about the product or similar products.

Best Monitor for Photo Editing Buying Guide

In this article I introduce the main features to consider in the selection of a monitor for photography and photo editing.

Purchasing a new monitor may be particularly useful if you use a portable computer, as many people do today. Reading the characteristics which follow, you’ll discover how laptops concentrate all the negative aspects.

In addition, a good monitor for photograph must have the option to be calibrated. Calibrating the monitor on a laptop is usually more difficult and sometimes we do not do so precisely.

What are the characteristics to assess in the choice of the monitor?

As is the case for any technology product, if you start delving deep into the technical specifications for computer monitors it seems like the lists are as numerous as confetti. Fortunately, however, the number of features to keep in mind for photographic use is limited.

Let’s look at them one by one.

Size

This is an easy-to-understand feature, certainly, the larger monitor is better. The difficult part is deciding which is the minimum size that allows us to work comfortably while not spending too much.

When choosing a monitor for your computing needs, you should first think about your desk size, vision acuity and the distance you’re sitting from the monitor. People who struggle with a tiny 13 inch notebook screen not only invite eyestrain but also poor posture. Displaying a highly detailed photograph or other image on a small screen like this does not help you see how it really is supposed to look.

Most laptops have 15 inch screens, but this is hardly better than the smaller option. What you gain in convenience and portability forces you to lose out on display quality and comfort. Photographers and artists need a larger and higher quality display in order to properly view and edit their pictures.

From what I’ve read, and according to my personal experience, I would recommend you do not drop below 24 inches, 27"-32" is a nice size for editing. If your budget is very tight you can settle for a 23-inch.

Monitors of this size are large enough to justify the expense. Furthermore, they allow you to view your pictures at a good level of magnification and simultaneously hold all the toolbars and panels typical of photo editing software and post-photographic production.

In particular, these dimensions relate to screens with proportions of 16:10. I believe the old 4:3 is no longer available, while the 16:9 favor the width too much when compared to the height and can make awkward access to functionality of the various programs.

The monitor’s 16:10 fits perfectly into pictures taken with the landscape orientation and also leave a generous amount of space for the various toolbars arranged vertically in many image editing programs.

Finally, this is the dimension that at the moment it offers the best price/performance ratio.

TN or IPS?

The Twisted Nematic (TN) is a very well known form of technology and it is also considered to be the oldest as well. Its best feature is that it gives short response times, which is why it is great for a gaming platform, but unfortunately is not good for a photographic use. When combined with LED lighting, a Twisted Nematic monitor can provide a lot of brightness and use less power than other technologies of its kind.

However, TN also has features that are not as advantageous. For instance, it has color distortions that happen when viewing wide angles. These monitors have 6 bit color technology. They are not able to show all the colors of the 24 bit color range that most video cards can show you, which add up to around 60 million colors. There are huge differences in certain products, but the ones that are on the low end will have a color for just the medium range angle changes. You will be able to recognize a Twisted Nematic monitor because of such color modifications, if you are looking at the picture from the top or from the sides.

In Plane Switching (IPS) is a contemporary technology that uses other types of technologies such as S-IPS, AS-IPS, H-IPS and E-IPS. The main reason that you want to use IPS panels is because they are either 8- or 10-bit technology. They produce a minimum of 125 percent of the colors that are available in the NTSC gamut. Also, these colors are not distorted when you look at them from various angles. The majority of them can be viewed well beyond 170 degrees. Previously, the only problem had to do with emphasizing the black colors, which usually meant that there were going to be some problems with the contrast. Also, IPS panels tend to be pricey and they are also slow at first.

Manufacturers have begun to produce Super IPS panels, but at cheaper prices. The response times have been reduced a lot and the contrast has been greatly enhanced. Also, the color display and the selections to calibrate the colors are a lot better than other panels of this kind. There is no distortion, even when you are viewing at shaper angles.

IPS monitors have not really been affordable, but the gap is starting to close. Just one year ago, most IPS monitors were three times expensive than the regular TN monitors. However, the 23 inch screens can be bought for around three hundred dollars these days. If you want professional graphic monitors that utilize IPS technology, you will have to still pay about a thousand dollars for it.

So the IPS monitor is the best monitor for photography mainly for two reasons:

  • Allows you to play a very large number of colors (close to 100% of the color space sRGB),
  • Provides a visual angle very high.

VA is another good technology

, but it is not used as much. Similar to IPS panels, this type of technology utilizes a minimum of 8 bit technology, provides good coverage and the colors are not distorted when shown at different angles.

Matte screen or Glossy Screen?

Glossy Screen

Matte screen

Indoors, the glossy can still reflect a great deal of light.

If you make a turn at any electronics store, you’ll notice how the monitors of portable and those for fixed computer screens have glossy screens.

The glossy appearance favors the contrast and vibrancy of colors and is designed for the use of the computer that is dedicated to the entertainment, but unfortunately, as far as sexy may seem, these monitors have several disadvantages that are particularly evident in photographic work.

For example, the glossy screens reflect the sources of light and even the shapes of what lies in front of the monitor, by altering the perception of what is shown, saturation and contrast do not correspond to the content of the photo, especially once it is printed.

The monitor is not glossy are said matte. They are easily recognizable in each case, you’ve worked a monitor of this type.

If you buy on the internet, you can’t recognize at a glance if a monitor is matte or glossy. You should be able to discover by looking between the technical characteristics or possibly looking for on Google the name of the monitor associated with the word glossy.

My advice:

If they will be shown on just one screen, both of them are no problems. If they will be utilized for print, then opt for matte, which will have better saturation as a result of the glossy screens. Glossy is not the same as what you will get with print.

Bit depth LUT

Monitor display calibration is limited no matter what model you own. Owners of digital monitors should resist any changes from the factory settings because this can result in a loss of colors and shades. One way to counteract this is by buying a monitor with a higher bit depth LUT. This not only affects the specificity of the calibration, but also allows the monitor to utilize more colors in its display.

Bit depth LUT

Note: Since the input values for the display remain the same, a higher bit depth LUT will not display more colors at the same time. A video card with a higher bit depth LUT will not improve accuracy of calibrations if not paired with a similarly equipped monitor.

In a system with a low bit depth, the darkest (1) and the brightest (4) shades merge with white (5) and black (0) because the shades themselves are rounded up or down to the closest output available. A system with a high bit depth LUT does not need to round shades to the closest output value that can use additional intermediate values. Because of this increased precision, posterization of image and color banding are not a problem for even the oldest and most color-changed displays.

Most currently available monitors have 8-bit LUT, though 6-bit and higher 10-bit LUT’s are also on the market. For most purposes, 8-bit options deliver quality calibrations and clearer, color-true pictures. There are also monitors, usually LCD and marketed specifically to gamers, that sacrifice bit depth LUT for higher refresh rates. This process is the quick change of animated graphics in that many games with more quality and smoothness, but is no importance for those interested in viewing photos and still graphics.

Standard Gamut or Wide Gamut (Extended Gamut)?

RGBAll physical devices have restrictions when it comes to the types of colors that it can provide. An inkjet printer does not have the ability to produce a better shade of yellow than what is provided by the ink cartridge. The shade of red that your monitor shows is restricted by the hardware that is utilized in the LCD panel. This is known as the device’s color gamut.

A majority of monitors have a color gamut that matches the SRGB color gamut. You might already know that the sRGB color gamut does not have as much as the more commonly utilized Adobe 1998 version. Also, a lot of the Adobe colors that can be printed via your inkjet printer are actually not in the range of the SRGB colors. As a result, your camera can provide these colors and they can be printed with your printer. However, you cannot see them on your monitor. Basically, you will view an estimate of these colors because they are restricted by the monitor’s color gamut.

Wide gamut monitors get rid of this issue because what they have is matched up with a bigger amount of what the Adobe 1998 has. You can find this amount in the monitor’s specs. The benefit of this is that you can view colors in your pictures that look brighter than the regular gamut monitor. This gives you the ability to see all of the colors in your pictures.

It is best to have a wide gamut display because this is the way of the future. This is practically what is available right now. To utilize this type of display, you have to know about color managed workflows and possess a display that has the right calibration. You also have to utilize a color managed app such as Photoshop. This is not that hard to manage, but you have to know exactly what you are doing in order to be successful with it.

How to choose:

Depending on your photo and graphic display and editing needs, you need to choose a monitor that covers the sRGB spectrum and possibly the Adobe RPG spectrum as well. The first specification is found on every single quality monitor on the market today.

The sRGB spectrum is more than sufficient for web-based photographs and all graphics that are intended to be displayed on a monitor in their final form. For artists that print their work, the Adobe RPG spectrum capable monitor will result in better clarity, color correctness and ultimately higher-quality work.

Currently, nearly all monitor can cover more than 99% of the sRGB spectrum however not all of them can cover most of the Adobe RGB spectrum.

LED Monitors

You are entering the market monitor LCD backlit LED. in this case too there are different types, corresponding to different acronyms.

For photographic use, ask attention to buy a monitor RGB LED and not el-wled . The second option does not provide a color reproduction sufficiently faithful.

Viewing Angle

The first LCD monitor for your computer suffered from an angle of view very reduced. What does that mean?

With a reduced visual angle, moving left to right, top or bottom with respect to the central axis of the monitor, the colors are transformed and the contrast changes . You can imagine how it is absolutely recommended in a monitor to use for photo retouching.

The monitor of more recent production, allow you to move to the right or to the left relative to the monitor without noting obvious changes in the image. Choose a monitor with at least 120° of visual angle horizontal and possibly the same for the vertical.

Resolution

On this aspect there is little to say, the available resolutions are not a lot, especially, the resolution is also determined by the size of the diagonal.

For a monitor by 23 or 24 inches, the size that I advised before, do not fall under a native resolution of 1920 * 1200. Recalls that LCD monitors should be always used to their resolution, so don’t think you can use a resolution higher or lower than the one specified.

Should You Buy a 4K monitor?

Any full-size image on a 4K monitor will be displayed with enough detail and beauty for a photographer’s appreciation. Your palettes tools can also be set to an incredible number.

These pictures also require the ability to zoom in and out in a photo editing program like Photoshop and also to display text and fonts clearly and at the correct size. This differs from standard video, television or gaming monitor usage.

Most computer software applications are designed to make use of full high definition resolutions, which results in text that is easily viewed from a standard distance away. In 4K format, text minimizes to an uncomfortable level in the same programs and software apps.

4K is becoming highly active in the 2016 market but this display technology is outpacing some of the older programs that people still use every day. If you combine software usage from even two or three years ago with the new 4K option, the size of your text will be unreadable. This makes for very difficult computing and a lot of frustration between modern technology usage and keeping older but not yet obsolete software.

In order to get the best benefit from 4K, you need to make sure that the programs you use work well with it. Many of the standard Windows applications work well with 4K already although some Windows desktop ecosystems may lag behind this technology.

By far the most popular graphics and photography editing software, Adobe Photoshop, is already working well with 4K displays. Even the largest pictures can be viewed with full detail at high resolutions and in actual size without the need to zoom in or out or scroll the workspace. The entire Photoshop interface scales easily so you have no problem accessing all your favorite tools and palettes. If you are regularly engaged in photography or graphics editing or work with videos, a 4K monitor is virtually essential.

To conclude, my personal opinion is that the 4K display capabilities are very attractive but not quite yet practical for all uses. In your excitements about this new technology, it is still important to hang back a bit and make sure all your existing hardware and the programs you use regularly work with the 4K monitor before you purchase one.

Digital connection

Now all of the monitors should be equipped with a digital connection, HDMI or DVI. Be careful not to buy a fund of magazine that has only the VGA.

Also, check which ports are available on your computer. Don’t worry, however: adapters exist able to convert any format.

Our recommendation:

Eizo ColorEdge CG277 (High end choice, 10-bit color +16 bit LUT, 99% Adobe RGB)

Eizo ColorEdge CG277

EIZO’s crown jewel, the ColorEdge CG277 monitor, is aimed at professionals in the video editing, digital photography, prepress, and post production fields. And honestly, it’s the perfect screen for them, with its 27-inch wide CG277 display any professional would appreciate, housing a self-calibrating sensor that shifts up to store neatly into its frame. The CG277’s internal correction sensor utilizes an external sensor to store and maintain calibration results. It can pack a punch with all of its bells and whistles: a 2560×1440 pixel resolution, a 10-bit display complete with 16-bit look-up table, a wide-gamut IPS panel capable of reproducing 99% of the Adobe RGB colour space, DVI-D input terminals, LED backlight, a DisplayPort, and HDMI capacity. But, if you can believe it, that’s not all it comes with! The Eizo ColorEdge CG277 also has tone characteristics that activate a mere seven minutes post-powerup, stable brightness chromaticity, an elegant ergonomic stand, and, to top it all off, a monitor hood capable of switching between portrait mode and landscape.

It is singularly considered to be the best choice for imaging professionals that work with video or still production. Why?

Well, this is mainly due to the CG277’s phenomenal colour accuracy. Despite having just raved about how amazing it is, we do need to stress that its lack of 4K resolution does somewhat decrease how appealing it is as a screen, in comparison to other 4K models out on the market. And yet, it is this small flaw, interestingly enough, other 4K models helps keep the cost of this outstanding monitor low. What does this all mean for professional users? Plainly put, it means that it’s an excellent time to purchase it at such an affordable price.

Ideally, all that CG277 performance and power would come in a much more eye-catching frame. But, that bulky screen is really no big deal when you add up all the pros about this model. Honestly, this 27incher has the same footprint as its same-sized competitors, all thanks to its unobtrusive, yet highly efficient, monitor stand.

The Eizo CG277’s built-in calibration sensor may be considered a tad on the useless side for professionals or companies that prefer a uniform sensor for their displays. But, undoubtedly, there are countless businesses or individual professionals out there that have only one quality screen to rely on, and in turn, will invariably believe this built-in sensor is very convenient.

If you’re in need of a solid, dependable display for your professional grade work, then there are no hard cons, only pros, with the CG277. Enthusiasts will note that there are other screens out there that would provide an equally excellent performance for a fraction of the price.

Our Opinion

You’ll be hard-pressed to find a better display for colour accuracy than the Eizo ColorEdge CG277, although others may not have that 4K resolution if that’s what you’re looking for. However, if you’re a professional that doesn’t depend primarily on display resolution, the CG277 is an attractive option.

>>Read More information and user reviews on B&H Photo<<

ASUS PA329Q – High end choice, 4K, 10 bit, 99.5% Adobe RGB, 32 inch

ASUS PA329Q

Check out the ASUS PA329Q ultra-wide monitor if you’re shopping for a top quality professional grade screen since the high pixel density is an absolute ‘must have’ feature. That’s why we’re looking at Asus’ sleek PA329Q model right now with its ever popular 32-inch Ultra HD resolution IPS panel.

Professionals need a truly reliable monitor that can withstand whatever tough project their job requires them to do. So, with that in mind, it’s clear to see that the Asus’ ProArt series provides users exactly what they need with its wide range of factory-calibrated color choices. We had previously assessed the PA328Q model which boasted everything a professional would require for their color-critical applications, with the exception of a wide-gamut option. However, here we look into the PA329Q features 32-inch IPS panel and Ultra HD resolution capabilities, including the ever-so-useful addition of Adobe RGB.

Above all else, the PA329Q is, without a doubt, an excellent price. In comparison to other similar 32-inch Ultra HD monitors, the Asus PA329Q, with its sleek style and consistent screen output, simply gives you much more value-wise. And, even though it is one of the few monitors classified in its range, it stands out for its resolution and wide-gamut option.

In all honestly, you’ll be hard-pressed to find a poor quality product amongst truly professional monitors. Although not all screens are created equally, once you do start to assess factory-certified calibration PC monitors you’re, essentially, guaranteed a certain level of quality. And, without exception, the PA329Q upholds that standard of accuracy. The Asus PA329Q is, therefore, a smart choice for users seeking professional-grade level models.

We like the PA329Q and its many capabilities and would certainly recommend it to those on the lookout for a less expensive alternative to higher-end (and higher price range) screens. Although we’d appreciate seeing more extensive color meter support and more of the OSD’s features available with extra picture modes, we do appreciate its fixed RGB and Adobe RGB mode reliability. Asus adds on even more value by including user-friendly calibration software. Aside from those points, this model would make a sturdy, dependable addition to any professional’s office.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

LG 31MU97 Great Choice for Video Editing 4096×2160, (True 4K), 99.5% Adobe RGB, 31 inch

LG 31MU97

Prepare to be amazed at the LG 31MU97-B’s resolution, which is an impressive 4096 x 2160p, and is specifically targeted towards a more professional crowd. This LG native 4K resolution display will most certainly delight photographers, graphic designers, and video editors alike with its professional-grade capabilities. We believe video editors will be particularly pleased because of the LG 31MU97-B monitor’s relative ease of use, and remarkably hassle-free, video post-production abilities with minimal to nil levels of distortion.

Users can smoothly multitask between different programs, all without having to switch back and forth between windows, on this 17:9 aspect ratio widescreen, which can prove to be a real timesaver. Consequently, users can take advantage of this feature to compare and contrast graphics and pictures and observe any colour variances without the hassle of going back-and-forth between windows.

LG 31MU97-B’s IPS display supports 99.5% Adobe RGB. Its wide colour gamut (and colour temperature) reduces any colour difference and loss which, incidentally, covers both color ranges or CMYK and sRGB. This means users can effortlessly retouch their images and photos. The end result is unbelievably vivid and vibrant colours on your final product which other panels (like the VA) simply cannot provide.

After having mentioned all this, do keep in mind that, when you push this monitor to its optimum resolution of 4096×2160p at 50 Hz, it does become a bit shaky. Unfortunately, the LG 31MU97-B screen does not support a 60Hz Refresh Rate. So, that means any animated transitions, sliding through windows, or even so much as scrolling up and down webpages can seem to be a bit jerky. Although it’s a noticeable issue, we can’t say it’s overtly distracting, particularly if you’re used to screens that run at 60Hz. Luckily, you can avoid all this by turning it down to 3840×2160 which allows you to run at 60Hz. Users will still need to deal with a bit of letterboxing once they select this option, but it’s a small price to pay to avoid frame rate reduction.

For those professionals in need of a high-tech, top-level PC monitor, loaded with the latest technology to date, then the multi-functional and fully loaded LG 31MU97-B is the answer. Ideal for videographers, photographers, graphic designers, or basically anyone who deals with content creation requiring consistent, accurate, and clear colour. Having said this, a monitor of this caliber is, in fact, best suited for people that need 10-bit colour/Adobe RGB colour gamut or Cinema 4K resolution.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

BenQ SW2700PT – Mid-end Choice, 99% ADOBE RGB, 2560×1440, 14 bit

BenQ SW2700PT

Are you a professional on the hunt for a top quality monitor known for its unique colour capacity and intense display palette? You’ll need to look no further than the BenQ 27-inch SW2700PT. Professionals prefer this model because of its detailed QHD screen resolution which is considered to be the best in its class.

With its 100% AdobeRGB capabilities, the technologically advanced BenQ SW2700PT screen stands out clearly from other monitors. Its sharp images and crisp definition demonstrate a superior colour saturation with an excellent vivid contrast. Despite its accuracy to display images, the BenQ SW2700PT’s screen consistency cannot quite compete with more expensive, higher grade models. However, considering the surprisingly affordable $600 price tag on this monitor, it is undoubtedly a fantastic value considering its technological capabilities. In fact, you’d need to spend upwards of $1200 for better screen consistency, which makes the BenQ SW2700PT a real steal at that price.

With a clear 2,560-by-1,440-resolution screen, the SW2700PT monitor boasts an impressive 27-inch WQHD matte panel which is all based on advanced AHVA technology. It’s easy to see how similar to In-Plane Switching (IPS) technology it is, considering its wide viewing angles and stunning color intensity. This monitor allows for hardware calibration allowing the user to access screen processing circuitry to adjust color settings for preference, instead of altering GPU output. Additionally, the SW2700PT monitor uses a 14-bit Look-Up Table (LUT) which controls color management and ensures precise, smooth color gradation. Users will need to acquire their own colorimeter, but, by downloading BenQ’s free proprietary Palette Master Element calibration software, they can save any selected settings as a preset and easily calibrate their monitor.

This screen is remarkably well designed with excellent additional features such as a built-in USB3 hub with SD card reader and the handy remote control that allows for quick, seamless setting changes. The SW2700PT monitor and shading hood is ergonomically designed and includes such useful features as the multi-adjustable screen stand that is capable of pivoting positions from landscape to portrait. Colour-wise, although its colour performance is rated as solid and reliable, the SW2700PT’s black and white display values and accuracies are considered to be superb. This monitor will most assuredly please professional photographers, graphic artists, and designers since it covers 100% of Adobe RGB. Personally, I would prefer a newer HDMI 2.0 port as opposed to the outdated HDMI 1.4 port this screen offers, but that’s a pretty trivial issue considering it by no means prevents us from giving our Editors’ Choice award to the BenQ SW2700PT for the midrange, big-screen monitor category.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Dell P2715Q and P2415Q – 4K monitor, 79% AdobeRGB, 27 or 23.8 inch

Dell P2715Q

Are you looking for a monitor that can deliver a particularly excellent image quality? Then the factory-calibrated P2715Q will ensure pristine color quality reproduction from day one and guarantee any user with near-real-life imagery. Initial screen tests showed that it could, in fact, cover 79% of the AdobeRGB spectrum and 100% of the sRGB spectrum. We were impressed! Moreover, the contrast ratio is remarkable reaching 690:1 when at maximum brightness.

According to industry photographers, the DELL P2715Q surpasses expectations with its superb colour and picture quality, as well as colour production, thanks to its 4K resolution and IPS panel. Keep in mind that only a select few other monitors nowadays offer wider colour gamuts. Also, most inexpensive 4K screens can only manage about 70 to 75% of the AdobeRGB spectrum. All this means that the P2715Q is, without a doubt, ahead of its time. Nevertheless, you definitely want to purchase a display that is closer to 100% Adobe RGB if you’ll need to do any Illustrator, Lightroom, or Photoshop work, thus requiring higher quality, or magazine-ready, printing. Moreover, the contrast ratio on this UHD PC monitor is considered to be truly one of the best on the market to date.

Unquestioningly, the Dell P2715Q is an advanced 4K monitor in comparison to other similar range models out there. It was one of the first monitors to offer exceptional image quality at an affordable price, all while supplying the user with a durable frame, an ergonomic stand, and fully functional 3840 x 2160 pixels of full UHD visual connectivity. If you don’t have a lot of space in your office set-up, or if you perhaps wish to save a bit money-wise, then the Dell P2415Q would be a great selection for you due to its smaller size. Truth be told, this monitor’s factory-calibrated picture is minimally less accurate than our preferred screen choice, but in the end, the difference is trivial. When it comes down to it, this 24-inch screen has many similarities as the larger P2715Q: the same display connections and IPS panel type, the same display resolution (3840×2160), audio connection and USB 3.0 hub (minus one port), and the same VESA support and physical adjustability.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

Philips 276E6ADSS – Affordable wide gamut Monitor, Price under 300$

Philips 276E6ADSS

First off, we’d like to emphasize how truly interesting and unique the Philips 276E6 because of its wide colour gamut which is void of unnecessarily costly or complex backlight arrangement. The key is the screen’s IPS-ADS and Quantum Dots combo. With it, the monitor is capable of producing an exceptionally fine, bright image with outstanding color saturation, some great viewing angles, pretty decent contrast, and lots of light output. Want to know a little perk? It does all of this with ultra-low power consumption. A fantastic quality considering its lower price category within the range of rank-and-file professional screens.

However, there are a few drawbacks when compared to elite range screens, like the Dell UP2716D, that have wide gamut capabilities. Prominent issues include the lack of emulation modes in order to cut down on native colour gamut as well as the use of PWM for regulating backlight. Keeping these shortcomings in mind, we would not recommend the Philips 276E6ADSS for any color-critical work. Yet, it will surely satisfy all other users with its lovely image quality.

There are a few more points not in its favor that we feel we should mention, namely, its lower resolution, surprising lack of ports, the absence of overall ergonomic flexibility, and VESA mounting. Also, this screen only comes in white. Now, that’s not necessarily a drawback, but, some users will go for it, while others will simply be put-off. It’s not a perfect monitor by any means, but it’s a nice option for users that have a limited budget to work with and will appreciate a monitor that offers an Adobe RGB colour gamut.

Many professionals like the option to have color saturation beyond what typical video standards require. Standard HDTV picture modes, for instance, will have options like Vivid and Brilliant which increase gamut to enhance screen image. It’s not just for showroom purposes; plenty of people gladly use them daily. The Philips 276E6 is perfect for users who prefer this approach as it offers a wide gamut with loads of brightness and high clarity at an affordable price. The Philips white frame and elegant modern styling will certainly stand out amidst a sea of industrial black monitors.

That $300 price tag is sure hard to beat, but of course, it all depends on your preferences and priorities. If wide gamut, sharp colors and quantum dots are an absolute requirement for you, then the Philips 276E6, costing less than $300, is one of the few ways you can bring those things home.

>>Read More information and user reviews on Amazon<<

last comments ...
Dan
Dan

Hi, I'm new in photo editing. I'm looking to upgrade my monitor and came across a ViewSonic model VP2468, has…
nilesh
nilesh

thanks very useful details
JD
JD

Hi Dan, I too have been looking at the Viewsonic VP2468. I have 4 Viewsonics and they have all…
Andre B
Andre B

Very informative article, thank you. I found this BenQ BL2420U UHD Designer monitor. Has anyone used it and if…
Jeff
Jeff

I was looking at getting the LG 31MU97, but now the new LG 32UD99 that was at CES this year…

  • June 20, 2017

Best Gaming Monitor 2018 Buying Guide (Everything You Should Know)

Gaming Monitor As Morpheus explained to Neo “The body cannot live without the mind”. He could just as easily have said that “The PC is nothing without the monitor”. And he would have been right to say it! Indeed, the monitor is the PC’s most essential component (for portable gaming computers or for any other type) and the one that allows you to experience different emotions whether by viewing family photos, watching a movie or playing a game. While, in general, LCD technology introduced improved visual comfort compared to CRT displays – the kind used in the 1990s – choosing a specific monitor is something which needs to be done wisely because the diversity of available displays is increasing all the time, something which can be a source of confusion for uninformed users.

In fact, over the last three years, there have been many innovations. First of all, QHD displays which have a resolution four times superior to the base HD resolution (1280 x 720 pixels) – some 2560 x 1440 pixels – are becoming increasingly popular – at a moment when 4K resolution displays (3840 x 2160 pixels) are making their way into the market. What’s more, 21:9 format displays are beginning to be built by manufacturers; this ratio is complementary to the traditional 16:10 and 16:9 ratios. Lastly, many new technologies have recently been introduced (144 Hz, G-Sync, ULMB, etc.), all of which aim to improve the fluidity and clarity of video animations.

(more…)

  • June 7, 2017

G-Sync vs. VSync vs. Freesync? What’s the Difference?

G-Sync vs. VSync vs. Freesync

When thinking about what graphics card and monitor to buy, there are more factors to consider than pure performance. That’s because no matter how many FPS your graphics card can spit out, if it doesn’t sync up with your monitor you might notice some tearing or lagging even at stable framerates. In this article we summarized how G-Sync and Freesync combat this problem.

What Is Tearing and How Does It Happen?

You’ve probably all seen it before if you’ve played PC games. Some notice it more than others but fact is, it happens almost all the time. Tearing describes what occurs when the GPU and monitor aren’t properly synchronized. This manifests itself with the monitor not always receiving one frame at a time, but sometimes even two or more, causing a noticeable “tear” in the image whenever it happens.

Freesync

To a certain degree, Vertical Sync (or VSync) can reduce this artifact. With VSync activated, the monitor puts a cap on the refresh rate. If, for example, your monitor supports a maximum of 60Hz (60 FPS) while your GPU could happily crank out 160 FPS, VSync puts a cap on the framerate and limits it to 60 FPS. In the real world however, this doesn’t always work as desired. Another drawback is that if your graphics card can’t achieve 60 FPS in a certain game your display will have to “wait” for new frames o display. This causes lag and stuttering even though it should theoretically run t 50 FPS. VSync also increases input-lag which can become especially annoying in fast-paces shooters or E-Sports in general.

(more…)

  • May 24, 2017

Datacolor vs. X-Rite Monitor Calibrator: what are they used for and how to choose?

Once you become seriously interested in photo editing, you will undoubtedly discover how indispensable a Monitor Calibrator (also called colorimeter) can be to your work. Why? That’s what we will be discussing throughout this article.

Datacolor

The Spyder 5 from Datacolor

Many photographers don’t bother using a monitor calibrator at all. Personally, I think this is mainly due to a lack of information on the subject. In fact, the price of these calibrator has dropped considerably in the last few years, meaning that they are no longer exclusively reserved for photo editing professionals. Let’s take a look at how they work and what they are used for…

(more…)

  • June 23, 2016

AOC AGON AG271QG, new gaming Monitor with NVIDIA G-SYNC

AOC has announced their new monitor AGON AG271QG a model for gamers, based in a IPS-AHVA model, with 2.650 x 1.440 resolution pixels and 27 inches diagonal. The IPS panel reaches a 165Hz updating frequency and 4ms in answer time from gray to gray. The vision angles have 178 degrees in vertical and horizontal, its dynamic contrast is 50.000.000:1 and the maximum brightness that its backlight LED is 350 cd/m2.

AOC AGON AG271QG

This monitor comes in hand with NVIDIA G-SYNC technology to synchronize its variable refresh rate with the FPS generated by the graphic in a way that all the problems derived from the bad synchronization, such as tearing, are avoided.

Regarding its connectivity it has DisplayPort and HDMI port, in addition to rapid charging USB ports.

Read More:
Best Gaming Monitor
Best Monitor for photo editing

  • October 2, 2015

ASUS ROG PG278Q Gaming Monitor User Review (Experience)

Beforehand: I’m a casual gamer. For me a PC is primarly a workstation not a toy. But when I want to play, I do it right. That’s why I assembled a very silent (thanks to a premium fan) and at that time a very powerful gaming PC: AMD FX 8350 processor (8-core) overclocked to 4.4 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 RAM G.Skill 1866 MHz and a GeForce GTX 780 TI from the house EVGA with SC version,also slightly overclocked. Granted, there is already more powerful hardware, but mine is now almost half a year old. What was missing was a real gaming monitor with 3D function that replaces my 22-inch 60 Hz screen by LG.

My choice was this monitor because at the present time it was the only device that even supported 1440p resolutionon on 27 inches. Up until now my graphics cards has been bored with all games at Full-HD at the maxium resolution. Now it can show what it can do. And it will have to because with 70% more pixels than before the fans are clearly audible. That’s why I recommend everyone who wants to buy this display to use a high-end graphics card. It would be a shame to not enjoy the high resolution image at full details. A GTX 780 seems to me to be currently the lowest limit, which should be used.

(more…)

  • September 18, 2015

AOC Launches Q2577PWQ IPS panel monitor with resolution of 2,560 x 1,440

AOC has unveiled a new monitor to hit the market during this month of September, the AOC Q2577PWQ. It is a 25-inch peripheral that uses an IPS (178 ° viewing angle horizontally and vertically) panel and reaching QuadHD resolution, ie, 2,560 x 1,440 pixels with a refresh rate of 75 Hz.

The panel has a latency of 5 milliseconds and has the Flicker-Free technology that prevents flickering. The maximum brightness is 350 cd/m2 and has a dynamic contrast ratio of 50,000,000 to 1.

(more…)

  • November 14, 2014

The new iMac Retina disappoints in the benchmark.

Last week Cupertino’s company presented a new line of “all in one” desktop computers, named iMac Retina because of its 5K resolution. Besides introducing a higher resolution screen, several of its hardware components has been modified.

In spite of the changes that Apple has introduced in to their iMac Retina new line with regard to their previous models; and despite that the 5K resolution offers a really astonishing experience, the first benchmark performance tests applied to these models are reporting data that, certainly, represent a very reduced evolution in terms of power. Based on the information Apple offered in the launch event, everything suggested that the “updates” would be higher and better.

(more…)

last comments
Colin
Colin

Please note that you are comparing the i5 versions of the new iMac, while some of the competing computers…

  • November 10, 2014

New Dell 4K monitors: P2415Q and P2715Q

Dell will market two new upcoming 4K computer monitors, a format arising in coming quarters driven by the Intel agreement with manufacturers to lower the price to $399.

The new Dell 4K  monitors are P2415Q and P2715Q, both with IPS panels with native resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels with respective sizes of 23.8 and 27 inches diagonally.

Dell P2415Q

The smallest has a response time of 8 ms and a brightness level of 300 cd / m2, while the larger provides 350 cd / m2 brightness. The two share a static contrast ratio of 1,000: 1, viewing angles of 178 degrees and 99% support of sRGB color gamut.

They feature an ergonomic basis for regulating height, swivel and tilt feature HDMI video inputs (via MHL), DisplayPort, Mini DisplayPort, and a USB 3.0 hub ports. Price has not been provided although we expect the P24 price levels of $ 399 mentioned by Intel.

Latest reports reveal that in 2013, 90 percent of computer monitors had a resolution to 1080p or lower, Intel believes that the screen resolution can be one of the reasons why users have stopped updating their PCs. Hence it intends to drive new Ultra High Definition panels in the personal computer industry with a partnership that includes Samsung, one of the leading manufacturers of screens.

The stated goal is to offer 4K monitors from $399 on base models with screen sizes of 23 inches, while the AIOs computers ‘all in one’ 4K screen would cost $999.

last comments
mrandroid
mrandroid

Great news, very interesting monitors. I would like to see a comparison with last year UP2414Q specs